Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
Published on: September 25, 2011
To test or to not test: A retrospective cross-sectional study on potentially inappropriate use of pathology testing
Twisha R Banker1, Marianne H Gillam1, Peter O'Loughlin2,3,4
1Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Objectives:
To measure rates of potentially inappropriate pathology testing in the hospital setting.
Methods:
Retrospective cross-sectional study in hospital setting from July 2021 to December 2021. We examined 3 potentially inappropriate uses: overordering, selection errors, and unnecessary repeat testing. Overordering included vitamin D and lipids (rarely required in acute hospital care). Selection error was the ratio of iron studies to standalone ferritin requests. Unnecessary repeats included any repeat vitamin D, lipids, iron, or ferritin in an episode of care or C-reactive protein (CRP) repeated within 3 days and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) within 7 days and repeated previously abnormal CRP and NT-proBNP tests. Costs of inappropriate tests were estimated using the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedules.
Results:
Among 55,904 test requests, 15% (n = 8120) were potentially inappropriate. Vitamin D was frequently ordered (n = 4498), as were lipids (n = 2872). Ratio of iron studies to standalone ferritin was 36. Of 19,233 repeat CRPs, 36% (n = 6947) were within 3 days and 62% (n = 179) of repeat NT-proBNPs were within 7 days of the first test. For initially abnormal tests, 89% of CRPs and 97% of NT-proBNPs remained abnormal. Inappropriate test costs accounted for 12% to 30% of costs.
Conclusions:
Frequent potential inappropriate use and selection of pathology tests was observed in South Australian hospitals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:11Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
01:30Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
01:16Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:23Toxicity Testing in Animals
01:26Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test