Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Procedure to Evaluate the Efficiency of Flocculants for the Removal of Dispersed Particles from Plant Extracts
Published on: April 9, 2016
Microplastic removal in batch and dynamic coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation systems is controlled by floc size
Malik M A Awan1, Tyler Malkoske1, Husein Almuhtaram1
1Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada.
Conventional jar tests overestimate microplastic (MP) removal efficiency. Optimal MP reduction relies on aluminum hydroxide floc formation, but continuous-flow systems show lower removal rates than batch tests. Turbidity reduction strongly correlates with MP removal.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Water Treatment Engineering
- Materials Science
Background:
- Most microplastic (MP) removal studies use high coagulant doses, mimicking sweep flocculation, leaving other conditions understudied.
- Bench-scale jar tests are common but their batch hydrodynamics differ significantly from full-scale continuous-flow systems.
- The impact of various operating conditions on MP removal in water treatment remains largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess microplastic removal using conventional jar tests and a continuous-flow bench-scale system.
- To identify optimal pH and alum dosages for MP reduction under varied coagulation conditions.
- To compare MP removal efficiency between batch and continuous-flow water treatment models.
Main Methods:
- Conducted jar tests with diverse microplastic sizes and types to determine optimal pH and alum dosages for MP reduction.
- Employed a continuous-flow bench-scale system to compare MP removal against jar test results.
- Analyzed correlations between microplastic concentration, turbidity reduction, and floc characteristics (size and concentration).
Main Results:
- Aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3) floc production was the primary driver for microplastic removal.
- Continuous-flow trials showed lower total MP removal compared to jar tests, indicating potential overprediction of performance.
- Strong correlations were found between MP concentration and turbidity reduction, suggesting turbidity as a viable surrogate.
- Significant correlations existed between floc size (90th percentile diameter) and concentration of larger flocs (>100 μm) and MP reduction.
Conclusions:
- Direct extrapolation of microplastic removal from jar tests to full-scale performance may be unreliable.
- Turbidity reduction can serve as a useful surrogate for monitoring microplastic removal efficiency.
- Floc characteristics, particularly larger floc sizes, are key indicators for effective microplastic removal in water treatment.
More Related Videos
05:31Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
Published on: July 28, 2018
09:01An Ultra-clean Multilayer Apparatus for Collecting Size Fractionated Marine Plankton and Suspended Particles
Published on: April 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Coagulation
Colloidal precipitates
Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control
The obtained precipitate should be either a pure substance of known composition or easily converted to one by a simple process, such as ignition or drying. In addition, the precipitate should be insoluble and easily filterable. In general, filterability...