Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis.

I J Fishman

    Seminars in Urology
    |November 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Hydroflex penile prosthesis offers a balance of rigidity and flaccidity for erectile impotence management. It provides good concealment and mechanical reliability, making it a viable option for patients seeking penile implants.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results.

    The Journal of urology·2001
    Same author

    Efficacy and safety of transurethral alprostadil in patients with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

    The Journal of urology·1998
    Same author

    Evaluation of erectile dysfunction and sleep-related erections.

    Journal of psychosomatic research·1997
    Same author

    Pregnancy in patients with the artificial urinary sphincter.

    The Journal of urology·1993
    Same author

    Simple technique for acute management of urethral hemorrhage.

    Urology·1992
    Same author

    Venous leaks: anatomical and physiological observations.

    The Journal of urology·1991
    Same journal

    The molecular staging of prostate cancer.

    Seminars in urology·1995
    Same journal

    New treatment strategies for hormone refractory prostate cancer.

    Seminars in urology·1995
    Same journal

    Cryosurgical ablation for prostate cancer: a current review.

    Seminars in urology·1995
    Same journal

    Role of induction androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy.

    Seminars in urology·1995
    Same journal

    Reducing length of stay after radical prostatectomy.

    Seminars in urology·1995
    Same journal

    Early intervention or expectant management for prostate cancer. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT): a randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with expectant management for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

    Seminars in urology·1995
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Medical Devices
    • Surgical Implants

    Background:

    • Erectile impotence management often involves surgical intervention with penile prostheses.
    • Various penile prosthesis designs offer different functional and aesthetic outcomes.
    • Patient selection and surgeon expertise are crucial for successful outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the clinical experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis.
    • To compare the Hydroflex prosthesis with other available penile implant options.
    • To highlight the advantages and limitations of the Hydroflex prosthesis in managing erectile dysfunction.

    Main Methods:

    • Clinical assessment of patients receiving the Hydroflex penile prosthesis.
    • Comparison of Hydroflex outcomes with rigid penile prostheses and inflatable penile prostheses (IPP).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of implantation simplicity, penile rigidity, flaccidity, concealment, erection quality, and mechanical reliability.

    • Main Results:

    • Hydroflex offers implantation simplicity and rigidity comparable to rigid devices.
    • Penile flaccidity and concealment are similar to IPP in most patients.
    • Erection quality (length and girth) is superior to rigid prostheses but less than IPP.
    • Excellent mechanical reliability has been observed to date.

    Conclusions:

    • The Hydroflex penile prosthesis is a valuable option for erectile impotence management.
    • It presents a favorable balance between rigidity, flaccidity, and concealment.
    • Informed patient counseling and surgeon discretion are key for optimal results with penile implants.