Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

56
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
56

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Configuring Parallelism for Hybrid Layouts Using Multi-Objective Optimization.

Big data·2020
Same author

Discovery of decomposed and mummified corpses in the domestic setting--a marker of social isolation?

Journal of forensic sciences·2002
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
08:59

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System

Published on: May 22, 2020

5.5K

evalPM: a framework for evaluating machine learning models for particulate matter prediction.

Lucas Woltmann1, Jonas Deepe2, Claudio Hartmann2

  • 1TU Dresden, Dresden Database Research Group, Dresden, Germany. lucas.woltmann@tu-dresden.de.

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
|November 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Particulate matter (PM) pollution poses significant health risks. The evalPM framework simplifies the creation and comparison of machine learning models for accurate PM concentration prediction, aiding environmental health research.

Keywords:
FrameworkMachine learningParticulate matterPrediction

More Related Videos

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves
05:07

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Published on: October 7, 2018

6.8K
Evaluating Regional Pulmonary Deposition using Patient-Specific 3D Printed Lung Models
07:56

Evaluating Regional Pulmonary Deposition using Patient-Specific 3D Printed Lung Models

Published on: November 11, 2020

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
08:59

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System

Published on: May 22, 2020

5.5K
Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves
05:07

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Published on: October 7, 2018

6.8K
Evaluating Regional Pulmonary Deposition using Patient-Specific 3D Printed Lung Models
07:56

Evaluating Regional Pulmonary Deposition using Patient-Specific 3D Printed Lung Models

Published on: November 11, 2020

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Data Science
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Particulate matter (PM) air pollution is a major global health concern.
  • Accurate prediction of future PM concentrations is crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies.
  • Existing machine learning (ML) models for PM prediction lack standardized evaluation, hindering comparison and selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce evalPM, a flexible framework for building, evaluating, and comparing ML models for PM prediction.
  • To address the challenge of comparing diverse ML models due to varied datasets and evaluation metrics.
  • To facilitate the selection of optimal ML models for specific PM immission prediction tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a modular framework, evalPM, offering flexibility in data sets, features, target variables, model types, hyperparameters, and evaluation metrics.
  • Implemented 16 diverse ML models from existing literature within the evalPM framework.
  • Conducted temporal prediction of PM concentrations using four distinct European datasets.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the capabilities and advantages of the evalPM framework through comparative analysis of 16 ML models.
  • Showcased the framework's ability to enable rapid creation and evaluation of ML-based PM prediction models.
  • Highlighted the framework's utility in assessing model performance across different datasets and prediction tasks.

Conclusions:

  • The evalPM framework significantly streamlines the process of developing and assessing ML models for PM prediction.
  • It provides a standardized and flexible approach, overcoming limitations of previous comparative studies.
  • EvalPM supports informed decision-making for selecting the most suitable ML models for environmental PM forecasting.