A brief history of the congenital myopathies - the myopathological perspective

Congenital myopathies are defined by early clinical onset, slow progression, hereditary nature and disease-specific myopathological lesions - however, with exceptions - demanding special techniques in regard to morphological diagnostic and research work-up. To identify an index disease in a family requires a muscle biopsy - and no congenital myopathy has ever been first described at autopsy. The nosographic history commenced when - in addition to special histopathological techniques in the earliest classical triad of central core disease, 1956, nemaline myopathy, 1963, and centronuclear myopathy, 1966/67, within a decade - electron microscopy and enzyme histochemistry were applied to unfixed frozen muscle tissue and, thus, revolutionized diagnostic and research myopathology. During the following years, the list of structure-defined congenital myopathies grew to some 40 conditions. Then, the introduction of immunohistochemistry allowed myopathological documentation of proteins and their abnormalities in individual congenital myopathies. Together with the diagnostic evolution of molecular genetics, many more congenital myopathies were described, without new disease-specific lesions or only already known ones. These were nosographically defined by individual mutations in hitherto congenital myopathies-unrelated genes. This latter development may also affect the nomenclature of congenital myopathies in that the mutant gene needs to be attached to the individually identified congenital myopathies with or without the disease-specific lesion, such as CCD-RYR1 or CM-RYR1. This principle is similar to that of the nomenclature of Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation. Retroactive molecular characterization of originally and first described congenital myopathies has only rarely been achieved.