Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Furlow Versus Straight Line Repair With Intravelar Veloplasty: A
Matthew J Davis1,2, Michelle G Roy1,2, Heather R Burns1,2
1Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine.
Background:
Measurements of postoperative velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) can be used to determine the efficacy of a palatoplasty operation. Hypernasality and audible nasal air emission are typical manifestations of VPD during speech. We aimed to longitudinally compare VPD outcomes in postpalatoplasty patients who underwent Furlow repair versus straight line repair with intravelar veloplasty (IVVP). Additionally, we examined the relationship between VPD outcomes and select pre-existing patient characteristics.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review was performed to identify primary palatoplasty patients treated from April 2012 to March 2021. Variables collected included gender, syndromic status, primary language, Veau cleft type, type of speech assessment, age at time of surgery, degree of hypernasality, presence of audible nasal air emission, and overall adequacy of velopharyngeal function. Pearson χ 2 test and multivariable t tests were used to analyze variables. Logistic regression was used to control for statistically significant variables.
Results:
Of the 118 patients included, 38 received a Furlow procedure and 80 received a straight line with IVVP procedure. Audible nasal air emission was present in 57.3% of straight line with IVVP patients and 42.9% of Furlow patients, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Clinically significant hypernasality was present in 42.1% of straight line with IVVP patients and 22.9% of Furlow patients ( P= 0.05). Velopharyngeal function was classified as adequate in 63.5% of straight line with IVVP patients and 83.3% of Furlow patients ( P= 0.03). However, after stratifying by syndromic versus nonsyndromic status, there was no statistically significant difference between straight line with IVVP and Furlow patients for postoperative hypernasality and velopharyngeal function.
Conclusions:
This study suggests that there are no statistically significant differences between straight line with IVVP and Furlow palatoplasty techniques regarding speech outcomes including hypernasality, audible nasal air emission, and overall VP function. Furthermore, select patient characteristics such as gender, primary language, syndromic status, age at repair, and Veau cleft type do not significantly impact postoperative speech outcomes.
