Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
Published on: February 19, 2015
Exploring the outcomes of research engagement using the observation method in an online setting
Deborah A Marshall1,2, Nitya Suryaprakash3, Danielle C Lavallee3,4,5
1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada damarsha@ucalgary.ca.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to explore the outcomes of research engagement (patient engagement, PE) in the context of qualitative research.
Design:
We observed engagement in two groups comprised of patients, clinicians and researchers tasked with conducting a qualitative preference exploration project in inflammatory bowel disease. One group was led by a patient research partner (PLG, partner led group) and the other by an academic researcher (RLG, researcher led group). A semistructured guide and a set of critical outcomes of research engagement were used as a framework to ground our analysis.
Setting:
The study was conducted online.
Participants:
Patient research partners (n=5), researchers (n=5) and clinicians (n=4) participated in this study.
Main Outcome Measures:
Transcripts of meetings, descriptive and reflective observation data of engagement during meetings and email correspondence between group members were analysed to identify the outcomes of PE.
Results:
Both projects were patient-centred, collaborative, meaningful, rigorous, adaptable, ethical, legitimate, understandable, feasible, timely and sustainable. Patient research partners (PRPs) in both groups wore dual hats as patients and researchers and influenced project decisions wearing both hats. They took on advisory and operational roles. Collaboration seemed easier in the PLG than in the RLG. The RLG PRPs spent more time than their counterparts in the PLG sharing their experience with biologics and helping their group identify a meaningful project question. A formal literature review informed the design, project materials and analysis in the RLG, while the formal review informed the project materials and analysis in the PLG. A PRP in the RLG and the PLG lead leveraged personal connections to facilitate recruitment. The outcomes of both projects were meaningful to all members of the groups.
Conclusions:
Our findings show that engagement of PRPs in research has a positive influence on the project design and delivery in the context of qualitative research in both the patient-led and researcher-led group.
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Observational Learning
The Scientific Method
Archival Research

