Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

514
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
514

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Horseshoe bats foraging in the wild adjust sensing to separate prey echoes from background clutter.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Agent-based modeling reveals how bats navigate dense group emergences.

eLife·2026
Same author

In-flight brainstem responses highlight the encoding of self-emitted echolocation calls in bats.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Female moths incorporate plant acoustic emissions into their oviposition decision-making process.

eLife·2026
Same author

Early experience affects foraging behavior of wild fruit bats more than their original behavioral predispositions.

eLife·2025
Same author

Onboard recordings reveal how bats maneuver under severe acoustic interference.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture
15:31

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Published on: October 23, 2019

12.3K

What determines the information update rate in echolocating bats.

Mor Taub1, Aya Goldshtein1,2,3,4, Arjan Boonman1

  • 1School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.

Communications Biology
|November 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Bats dynamically adjust their sensory update rate, measured by inter-pulse intervals (IPI), based on echolocation signal characteristics and flight parameters. This allows bats to optimize sensory information during commute flights.

More Related Videos

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity
13:05

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity

Published on: October 28, 2017

6.0K
Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan
00:07

Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan

Published on: August 27, 2019

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture
15:31

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Published on: October 23, 2019

12.3K
A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity
13:05

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity

Published on: October 28, 2017

6.0K
Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan
00:07

Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan

Published on: August 27, 2019

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Animal Behavior
  • Sensory Ecology
  • Bioacoustics

Background:

  • Sensory systems typically have fixed acquisition rates optimized by evolution.
  • Echolocating bats uniquely adjust their sensory update rate via inter-pulse intervals (IPI).
  • The precise factors regulating bat IPI remain largely unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how four echolocating bat species with diverse foraging strategies regulate their sensory update rate during commute flights.
  • To identify correlations between IPI and echolocation/movement parameters.
  • To understand the behavioral drivers of sensory update rate adjustments in bats.

Main Methods:

  • On-board audio recordings were used to capture echolocation calls.
  • Inter-pulse intervals (IPI) were analyzed in relation to flight parameters.
  • Four bat species with different foraging strategies were studied during commute flights.

Main Results:

  • A strong correlation was found between IPI and echolocation signal parameters (frequency, intensity).
  • IPI increased with higher signal peak-energy frequency and intensity.
  • IPI decreased with increased flight speed and altitude.
  • Bats appear to maintain sensory continuity by adjusting update rates.

Conclusions:

  • Bats modulate their sensory update rate based on behavioral context during commute flights.
  • Two distinct attention modes may be employed by bats during commutes.
  • Bats emit echolocation signals at precise intervals, suggesting internal regulation without external feedback.