Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

229
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
229
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

134
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
134
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

130
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
130
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

411
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
411

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination with a more plausible assumption.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same author

The efficient stored specimen design for evaluating multiple screening technologies: Application to multicancer detection tests.

Journal of medical screening·2025
Same author

The Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Cancer Prevention.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Quantifying Overdiagnosis for Multicancer Detection Tests: A Novel Method.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A short expansion.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Prediagnostic evaluation of multicancer detection tests: design and analysis considerations.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Evaluating Risk Prediction with Data Collection Costs: Novel Estimation of Test Tradeoff Curves.

Stuart G Baker1

  • 1Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
|November 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary

The test tradeoff curve helps determine if collecting data for risk prediction is valuable for treatment decisions. This new method uses individual risk scores to estimate the curve, improving upon older methods that required data grouping.

Keywords:
ROC curvesdecision curvesrelative utility curvesrisk predictiontest tradeoff

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • The test tradeoff curve aids in evaluating the utility of risk prediction data for treatment decisions.
  • It defines the minimum data collection points per true positive to justify risk prediction based on benefit-cost ratios or risk thresholds.
  • A high test tradeoff, like 3,000 tests per true positive cancer prediction, may indicate that risk prediction is not cost-effective.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel method for estimating the test tradeoff curve using individual risk scores.
  • To provide a more straightforward and appealing alternative to previous methods that required grouping risk scores.
  • To evaluate the performance of the new method using synthetic datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Estimates a concave receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve using individual risk scores.
  • Constructs a concave envelope of ROC points.
  • Employs a slope-based moving average and minimizes the sum of squared errors.
  • Connects successive ROC points with line segments to derive the test tradeoff curve.

Main Results:

  • The new method successfully estimates a concave ROC curve from individual risk scores.
  • The estimated concave ROC curve yields a corresponding estimated test tradeoff curve.
  • Analyses of two synthetic datasets demonstrate the method's applicability and effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Estimating the test tradeoff curve with individual risk scores is simple to implement.
  • This approach is more advantageous than prior methods necessitating risk score grouping.
  • The method provides a valuable tool for optimizing data collection in risk prediction for clinical decision-making.