Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differentiation and Generic Sentences.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Inequality threat increases laypeople's, but not judges', acceptance of algorithmic decision making in court.

Law and human behavior·2024
Same author

When the Ends Justify the Mean: The Endpoint Leverage Effect in Distribution Perception.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Beyond the incident: Influences on the perception of multiple instances of discrimination.

The British journal of social psychology·2024
Same author

Biased perception of distributions: Anchoring, interpolation and smoothing as potential causes.

Cognition·2023
Same author

The psychology of income wealth threshold estimations: A registered report.

The British journal of social psychology·2022
Same journal

Bodies in and out of place: The racialized entanglements of occupying space.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'Digitizing fear: Identity, threat and collective mobilization through social media posts during the 2021 election campaigns in West Bengal, India'.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The role of moral identity in ideological obsession and violent extremism.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

'Far right just means anyone who wants to support British values': Mobilizing 'British values' talk in discussions of the August 2024 UK race riots.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Managing acculturation threats with tailored self-affirmation interventions: A mixed-methods study with Syrian forced migrants.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Sharing for the common good: Children's levels of social inclusion within the group and their sharing decisions in a public goods game.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

464

Exaggerating differences back and forth: Two levels of intergroup accentuation.

Patrick Rothermund1, Roland Deutsch1

  • 1Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

The British Journal of Social Psychology
|November 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People exaggerate differences between groups, a process called intergroup accentuation. This exaggeration happens during initial group learning, especially for groups encountered second, influencing stereotype formation.

Keywords:
differentiationintergroup accentuationminoritiessocial categorizationstereotypes

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

907

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

464
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

907

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Social perceivers often exaggerate differences between groups, a phenomenon termed intergroup accentuation.
  • Existing research suggests intergroup accentuation impacts stereotype formation and intergroup relations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if intergroup accentuation originates during the initial learning of novel group information.
  • To examine the temporal dynamics of accentuation, specifically whether it occurs for groups encountered first or second.

Main Methods:

  • Two preregistered experiments were conducted using fictitious social groups.
  • Participants learned about two groups that probabilistically differed on two dimensional traits.
  • Intergroup accentuation was measured by assessing the exaggeration of differences between groups.

Main Results:

  • Participants exaggerated differences between the fictitious groups, confirming intergroup accentuation.
  • Accentuation was significantly stronger for the group encountered second, supporting the hypothesis that learning order matters.
  • Accentuation was also observed for the group encountered first, indicating a 'backward' effect even with unbiased initial learning.

Conclusions:

  • Intergroup accentuation is partly rooted in the processes of acquiring information about novel groups.
  • The order in which groups are encountered influences the degree of accentuation, with second-encountered groups showing stronger effects.
  • Findings have implications for understanding stereotype polarization, particularly for social minorities and out-groups often encountered later.