Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: December 9, 2022
Assessing the Potential of a Deep Learning Tool to Improve Fracture Detection by Radiologists and Emergency
Tianyuan Fu1, Vidya Viswanathan1, Alexandre Attia2
1University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (T.F., V.V., V.K., R.B., L.K.B., N.F.).
Rationale And Objectives:
To evaluate the standalone performance of a deep learning (DL) based fracture detection tool on extremity radiographs and assess the performance of radiologists and emergency physicians in identifying fractures of the extremities with and without the DL aid.
Materials And Methods:
The DL tool was previously developed using 132,000 appendicular skeletal radiographs divided into 87% training, 11% validation, and 2% test sets. Stand-alone performance was evaluated on 2626 de-identified radiographs from a single institution in Ohio, including at least 140 exams per body region. Consensus from three US board-certified musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists served as ground truth. A multi-reader retrospective study was performed in which 24 readers (eight each of emergency physicians, non-MSK radiologists, and MSK radiologists) identified fractures in 186 cases during two independent sessions with and without DL aid, separated by a one-month washout period. The accuracy (area under the receiver operating curve), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were compared with and without model aid.
Results:
The model achieved a stand-alone accuracy of 0.986, sensitivity of 0.987, and specificity of 0.885, and high accuracy (> 0.95) across stratification for body part, age, gender, radiographic views, and scanner type. With DL aid, reader accuracy increased by 0.047 (95% CI: 0.034, 0.061; p = 0.004) and sensitivity significantly improved from 0.865 (95% CI: 0.848, 0.881) to 0.955 (95% CI: 0.944, 0.964). Average reading time was shortened by 7.1 s (27%) per exam. When stratified by physician type, this improvement was greater for emergency physicians and non-MSK radiologists.
Conclusion:
The DL tool demonstrated high stand-alone accuracy, aided physician diagnostic accuracy, and decreased interpretation time.
More Related Videos
09:34A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation
Published on: September 14, 2017
07:12Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
Published on: September 28, 2017