Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion01:20

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

424
Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
424
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

39.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.0K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

357
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
357

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remembering affect between moments: assessing peak-end effects in continuous affect measures.

Cognition & emotion·2026
Same author

Computational protocol for hierarchical Bayesian modeling of perception and generalization in fear conditioning.

STAR protocols·2026
Same author

Detecting association changes in intensive longitudinal data in real time: An exponentially weighted moving average procedure.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

A goal-directed perspective on dampening of positive affect.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Testing and improving the robustness of amortized bayesian inference for cognitive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Accuracy in parameter estimation and simulation approaches for sample-size planning accounting for item effects.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The Rhythm Reproduction Task for children: A psychometric examination.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

QualGames: A Qualtrics implementation and a database of behavioral game theory tasks.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

PyLossless: A non-destructive EEG processing pipeline.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

"It makes sense to me": Examining data file column names in the visual cognitive literature.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.1K

Chasing consistency: On the measurement error in self-reported affect in experiments.

Niels Vanhasbroeck1, Sophie Vanbelle2, Agnes Moors3,4

  • 1Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. niels.vanhasbroeck@kuleuven.be.

Behavior Research Methods
|November 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examined measurement error in emotion research. Findings show that while affective measurements are consistent, the type of rating scale used does not impact this consistency.

Keywords:
Affect dynamicsConsistencyExperimentMeasurementReliability

More Related Videos

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
08:09

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Published on: February 11, 2017

11.5K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.1K
Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
08:09

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Published on: February 11, 2017

11.5K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Affective Science
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Emotion research frequently utilizes self-report rating scales to track affective fluctuations over time.
  • Measurement error is acknowledged in this data, but its extent and impact, particularly in experimental settings, require further investigation.
  • Daily-life studies complement experimental research, but experimental settings offer unique opportunities to control variables and assess measurement properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the test-retest consistency of affective measurements in an experimental setting.
  • To compare the consistency of affective measurements across different types of self-report rating scales.
  • To determine if the choice of rating scale influences the reliability of affect measurement.

Main Methods:

  • A probabilistic reward task was administered to 1398 participants.
  • Participants were repeatedly exposed to identical outcome sequences to enable test-retest reliability assessment.
  • Affective responses were measured using various self-report rating scales across multiple trials.

Main Results:

  • Affective measurements demonstrated moderate to good test-retest consistency.
  • No significant differences in measurement consistency were found between different types of rating scales.
  • The specific rating scale employed did not appear to affect the reliability of affect measurement.

Conclusions:

  • Self-report rating scales yield reliable affective measurements in experimental settings.
  • The choice of rating scale is not a critical factor in determining measurement consistency.
  • Future research can focus on other factors influencing affective measurement reliability beyond scale type.