Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

572
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
572
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg01:11

Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg

2.7K
Proper measurement of leg blood pressure is a critical skill for healthcare providers, ensuring precise and reliable readings. When performed correctly, this procedure informs patient care and enhances the efficacy of interventions. The following text outlines step-by-step guidelines to measure blood pressure in the leg, providing clarity and ease of understanding for practitioners.
Preparation:
2.7K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.1K
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

2.6K
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
2.6K
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

1.9K
Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
1.9K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.4K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating Equity in Topic Selection for Orphan Medicinal Products: Policy Implications for Health Technology Assessment in Rare Diseases.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same author

Application of a Prevalence-Adjusted Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Framework for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same author

Economic and clinical value of hydrolyzed collagen in the management of spine surgery wounds: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Journal of medical economics·2026
Same author

Interventions to improve patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

BMJ open quality·2025
Same author

Comparative Effectiveness of Amniotic and Chorionic Grafts in the Treatment of Lower-Extremity Diabetic Ulcers Using U.S. Medicare Real-World Evidence (2018-2022): A Retrospective Observational Cohort.

Advances in wound care·2025
Same author

Comparing pulsed field ablation and thermal energy catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ADVENT trial.

Journal of medical economics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
06:45

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems

Published on: May 2, 2025

371

The Standardized Pressure Injury Prevention Protocol (SPIPP) Checklist 2.0: Content validation.

Joyce Pittman1, Joyce M Black2, Anna de Jesus3

  • 1College of Nursing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|November 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study revised the Standardized Pressure Injury Prevention Protocol Checklist 2.0. The updated checklist uses evidence-based items for effective pressure injury prevention in clinical practice.

Keywords:
acute carebundlechecklistcontent validityevidence‐based practicepatient safetypressure injury/ulcerprevention

More Related Videos

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device
05:16

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device

Published on: April 21, 2023

945
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

20.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
06:45

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems

Published on: May 2, 2025

371
Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device
05:16

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device

Published on: April 21, 2023

945
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

20.2K

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Patient Safety
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

Background:

  • Pressure injuries are a growing concern, with rising incidence rates.
  • Checklists enhance adherence to evidence-based practices and standardize complex care processes.
  • The original protocol required revision and validation to improve pressure injury prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To revise and test the content validity of the Standardized Pressure Injury Prevention Protocol Checklist 2.0.
  • To update the checklist based on the International 2019 Clinical Practice Guideline.

Main Methods:

  • Expert review and revision of checklist items by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel.
  • Content validity testing using a panel of eight national experts.
  • Analysis of individual item and total scale content validity index scores.

Main Results:

  • The revised checklist achieved a high total scale content validity index of 0.93.
  • Most items demonstrated strong content validity (0.875 to 1.0).
  • One low-scoring item was removed, and others were revised based on expert feedback.

Conclusions:

  • The Standardized Pressure Injury Prevention Protocol 2.0 offers a validated, evidence-based tool for pressure injury prevention.
  • Integration into clinical workflows supports nurses and providers in sustainable prevention efforts.
  • Standardized, early intervention is key to successful pressure injury prevention.