Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
Published on: February 19, 2015
Comparing attentional disengagement between Prolific and MTurk samples.
Derek A Albert1, Daniel Smilek2
1Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. dalbert@uwaterloo.ca.
Online participant recruitment platforms like Prolific and Mechanical Turk (MTurk) yield different results for attentional disengagement during cognitive tasks. MTurk participants showed more mind wandering and multitasking than Prolific participants.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Psychological Research Methods
Background:
- Attention frequently shifts from primary tasks to secondary activities (multitasking) or unrelated thoughts (mind wandering).
- Online platforms are increasingly used for participant recruitment in psychological studies, but platform-specific effects are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether attentional disengagement during a cognitive task differs between participants recruited from Prolific and Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk).
- To examine the influence of risk (point loss) on attentional disengagement across different recruitment platforms.
Main Methods:
- An attention task was administered to participants recruited via Prolific and MTurk, with varying risk levels for errors (high vs. low point loss).
- Attentional disengagement was measured through task performance, self-reported mind wandering, and multitasking frequency.
- A second experiment adjusted MTurk reputation criteria and remuneration to assess the persistence of platform differences.
Main Results:
- Prolific participants exhibited lower levels of attentional disengagement compared to MTurk participants.
- MTurk participants showed significantly more disengagement, with an interaction effect where high-risk conditions reduced disengagement more than low-risk conditions on MTurk.
- Platform differences in individual traits and variable relationships were observed, and persisted even after adjusting MTurk criteria.
Conclusions:
- The choice of online participant recruitment platform (Prolific vs. MTurk) can substantially impact findings related to attentional disengagement.
- Recruitment platform characteristics, including reputation criteria and remuneration, may influence participant engagement and task performance.
- Researchers must consider potential platform biases when designing and interpreting studies involving cognitive tasks and online participant samples.
More Related Videos
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
08:45A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014