Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Does structural form matter? A comparative analysis of pooled procurement mechanisms for health commodities
Koray Parmaksiz1, Hester van de Bovenkamp2, Roland Bal2
1Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. korayparmaksiz@gmail.com.
Pooled procurement mechanisms, whether buyer-owned or third-party, require different levels of buyer alignment for success. Buyer-owned models need homogeneity and shared goals, while third-party models rely on adapting to the organization
Area of Science:
- Health policy and management
- Supply chain management
- International health economics
Background:
- Pooled procurement, a collaborative buyer initiative, gained prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic to enhance access to health commodities.
- Mechanisms range from buyer-owned collaborative models to third-party managed organizations.
- Limited understanding exists regarding the distinct characteristics, implementation, and development processes of these different pooled procurement structures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the characteristics, implementation, and developmental processes of buyer-owned and third-party pooled procurement mechanisms.
- To identify factors influencing the success of different pooled procurement models.
Main Methods:
- A qualitative multiple case-study design was employed.
- Four pooled procurement mechanisms were purposefully selected: two buyer's owned (Organisation of the Eastern Caribbean States and Pacific Island Countries) and two third-party (Global Drug Facility and Asthma Drug Facility).
- Data were collected using the Pooled Procurement Guidance, peer-reviewed articles, grey literature, and semi-structured interviews with procurement experts.
Main Results:
- Buyer-owned mechanisms necessitate greater alignment among buyers regarding procurement systems, financing, product needs, and legal frameworks, particularly when buyers are homogeneous and perceive urgent problems.
- Third-party mechanisms require less buyer-to-buyer consensus, focusing instead on alignment with the third-party organization's operations.
- Successful third-party mechanisms depend on the secretariat's ability to raise awareness, foster political will, secure funding, and attract skilled personnel.
Conclusions:
- Sustaining pooled procurement mechanisms requires continuous stakeholder engagement, robust funding mobilization, and strategic alignment of interests and needs.
- The success of pooled procurement is contingent on adapting strategies to the specific model (buyer-owned vs. third-party) and the context of participating buyers.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
07:25In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Bioequivalence: Overview
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...