Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autologous Palmaris Longus Tendon Augmentation for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Arthroscopy techniques·2026
Same author

A Novel Potential Landmark for Intraoperative Estimation of Femoral Stem Anteversion: An Analysis of Computed Tomography Measurements.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

[Achievements and Expectations of the Rare Disease Diagnostic Support Program in the Republic of Korea].

Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong·2025
Same author

Ultrasound-assisted measurement of humeral version: a radiation-sparing alternative to whole-humerus computed tomography.

Clinics in shoulder and elbow·2025
Same author

Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection Based on the Korean National Registry between 2011 and 2019.

Clinics in orthopedic surgery·2025
Same author

Balanced flexion gap is more strongly associated with postoperative outcomes than femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
09:00

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair

Published on: November 12, 2021

2.0K

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in A1 Pulley Release.

Young Bae Kim1, Yun Seong Choi1, Tae Hyuck Yoon1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)
|November 24, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

For A1 pulley release, absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures show similar scar quality and outcomes. Suture choice can depend on factors like cost and patient preference, as neither material demonstrated a significant advantage.

Keywords:
A1 pulley releaseabsorbable suturenonabsorbable suturetrigger finger

More Related Videos

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery
09:13

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery

Published on: October 6, 2022

3.2K
A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro
09:52

A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro

Published on: October 26, 2019

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
09:00

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair

Published on: November 12, 2021

2.0K
Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery
09:13

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery

Published on: October 6, 2022

3.2K
A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro
09:52

A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro

Published on: October 26, 2019

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Hand Surgery
  • Wound Healing

Background:

  • Sutures are crucial for palmar incisions, with absorbable and nonabsorbable types offering different benefits and drawbacks.
  • Nonabsorbable sutures require removal, while absorbable sutures avoid this but can cause inflammatory responses.
  • A1 pulley release is a common procedure where suture material choice impacts patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare scar quality and clinical outcomes between absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in A1 pulley release surgery.
  • To evaluate patient and observer scar assessments, pain scores, and complication rates.
  • To determine if one suture type offers superior results for A1 pulley release.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized study involving 41 patients undergoing A1 pulley release.
  • Patients were assigned to either absorbable or nonabsorbable suture groups.
  • Scar assessment scales and functional scores were collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were observed in scar quality or functional scores between the two suture groups.
  • Complication rates were slightly higher in the nonabsorbable group, though not statistically significant.
  • One patient in the absorbable group required reoperation due to uncontrolled bleeding.

Conclusions:

  • Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures yield comparable scar quality and outcomes after A1 pulley release.
  • Suture material selection can be based on physician/patient preference, cost, and availability.
  • Neither suture type demonstrated a clear advantage in this study, suggesting flexibility in choice.