Genomic Profiling and Clinical Outcomes of Targeted Therapies in Adult Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Stefania Kokkali1,2, Eleni Georgaki2, Georgios Mandrakis1

  • 1First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Cells
|November 24, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) shows limited clinical utility due to few targetable alterations. More prospective studies are needed to determine if genomic profiling improves STS patient management.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Translational Medicine

Background:

  • Genomic profiling advances cancer pathogenesis understanding and targeted therapies, particularly in epithelial tumors.
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used, but its role in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains debated.
  • Sarcomas often exhibit low mutational burden and lack recurrent targetable alterations, complicating therapeutic strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the clinical utility of NGS for guiding therapeutics in soft tissue sarcoma (STS).
  • To evaluate the current evidence and identify gaps in prospective research regarding genomic profiling in STS.

Main Methods:

  • Review of retrospective studies and anecdotal reports on NGS in STS.
  • Analysis of data on gene mutations, fusions, and amplifications detected by various NGS platforms.
  • Assessment of the use and efficacy of targeted treatments in different STS histotypes.

Main Results:

  • The clinical impact of genomic profiling in STS has not been prospectively investigated.
  • Data on the use and efficacy of targeted treatments in STS are scarce, with limited actionable alterations identified.
  • Targeted therapies, except for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), are often administered off-label or via clinical trials.

Conclusions:

  • The clinical utility of NGS in STS is controversial due to low actionable alteration rates.
  • Current evidence relies heavily on retrospective data and anecdotal reports, necessitating caution in interpreting treatment outcomes.
  • Prospective studies are essential to establish whether genomic profiling truly improves the management and outcomes for STS patients.