Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Transcatheter versus surgical mitral valve repair in patients with mitral regurgitation
Monil Majmundar1, Kunal Nitinkumar Patel2, Rajkumar Doshi3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of transcatheter and surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) in primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and MR with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods:
In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Nationwide Readmission Database to identify primary MR and MR with HFrEF patients who underwent transcatheter or SMVr from 2016 to 2019. A propensity score with 1:1 matching was applied. The primary outcome was a cumulative event rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, cardiac arrest and mitral valve replacement. Other important secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
Results:
After propensity score matching, 2187 matched pairs were found in the primary MR cohort and 2178 matched pairs were found in the MR-HFrEF cohort. Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) had significantly higher medium-term MACE compared with SMVr in both cohorts (primary MR: hazard ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-2.26, P ≤ 0.001; MR-HFrEF: hazard ratio: 2.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-2.54, P ≤ 0.001). TMVr showed similar in-hospital mortality in both cohorts.
Conclusions:
Although TMVr showed better short-term outcomes, it had significantly higher medium-term MACE than SMVr in both cohorts. Thus, shared decision-making should be performed for TMVr after discussing the benefits and risks in patients who can undergo SMVr.
Insights
Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) shows higher medium-term risks than surgical repair (SMVr) in primary mitral regurgitation and heart failure patients. Shared decision-making is crucial for TMVr, weighing benefits against risks compared to SMVr.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Valve Disease
Background:
- Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disease.
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) often coexists with MR.
- Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) offers a less invasive alternative to surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes of TMVr versus SMVr.
- To evaluate TMVr and SMVr in patients with primary MR.
- To assess TMVr and SMVr in patients with MR and HFrEF.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016-2019).
- 1:1 propensity score matching for patients undergoing TMVr or SMVr.
- Primary outcome: composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); Secondary outcome: in-hospital mortality.
Main Results:
- 2187 matched pairs for primary MR and 2178 for MR-HFrEF.
- TMVr demonstrated significantly higher medium-term MACE than SMVr in both cohorts (primary MR HR 1.73; MR-HFrEF HR 2.00).
- In-hospital mortality was similar between TMVr and SMVr in both groups.
Conclusions:
- TMVr has higher medium-term MACE compared to SMVr in primary MR and MR-HFrEF.
- While TMVr may offer short-term benefits, SMVr shows superior medium-term results.
- Shared decision-making is essential to discuss TMVr risks and benefits versus SMVr eligibility.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

