Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor
Fangzheng Yuan1,2, Carrie Lenneman3, Ronald Krone4
1Department of Pharmacy, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Background:
Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-angiogenics, are first-line therapies for advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Although TKIs have a greater potential for off-target adverse effects compared with bevacizumab (anti-angiogenics), a direct comparison of the risk of cardiovascular adverse events between these two types of therapies has not been performed.
Objective:
To compare the incidence of and characterize cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving TKIs versus bevacizumab.
Methods:
This cohort study included adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received first-line TKIs (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or bevacizumab at two academic medical centers and one community cancer center from September 2018 to August 2021. The primary outcome was risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Major secondary outcomes included the incidence of individual types of cardiovascular adverse events and risk factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Results:
The study included 221 patients (159 TKI patients; 62 bevacizumab patients). At a median follow-up of 5 months, the probability of cardiovascular adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.58-1.24; p = 0.390). The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events was highest in patients receiving lenvatinib (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.02-2.30) compared with those receiving sorafenib (reference) or bevacizumab (SHR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.68-1.64) after adjustment for comorbidities, liver transplant status, and presence of portal vein thrombosis at baseline. Cardiovascular adverse events were observed in 151 (68%) patients, and MACE were observed in 27 (12%) patients. Risk factors associated with MACE were hypertension (SHR: 3.5; 95% CI: 0.9087-15.83; p = 0.086), prior history of MACE (SHR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.83-4.87; p = 0.124), and tobacco use (SHR: 2.85; 95% CI: 0.90-8.97; p = 0.074).
Conclusions:
Cardiovascular risk was not significantly different between TKIs and bevacizumab. Lenvatinib appears to have the highest risk of cardiovascular adverse events among these first-line VEGF inhibitors.
Insights
Cardiovascular risk was similar between tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bevacizumab for advanced liver cancer. Lenvatinib showed a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to sorafenib or bevacizumab.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors are first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may have more off-target effects than bevacizumab, but direct cardiovascular risk comparison was lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare cardiovascular adverse event incidence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving TKIs versus bevacizumab.
- To characterize cardiovascular adverse events and identify associated risk factors.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 221 adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving first-line TKIs (sorafenib/lenvatinib) or bevacizumab.
- Primary outcome: risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Secondary outcomes: individual event types and risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in cardiovascular adverse event risk between TKIs and bevacizumab (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58-1.24).
- Lenvatinib showed a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to sorafenib or bevacizumab (SHR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.02-2.30).
- Hypertension, prior MACE, and tobacco use were associated with MACE.
Conclusions:
- Overall cardiovascular risk did not differ significantly between TKIs and bevacizumab in this cohort.
- Lenvatinib may pose a higher cardiovascular risk among first-line VEGF inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply

