Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.8K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

94
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
94
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Light pollution exposure during pregnancy and risk of childhood strabismus.

European journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Bayesian Validation of Dynamic Systems for Biological Networks.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2025
Same author

Nighttime Outdoor Artificial Light and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

JAMA network open·2024
Same author

Higher energy consumption in the evening is associated with increased odds of obesity and metabolic syndrome: findings from the 2016-2018 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (7th KNHANES).

Epidemiology and health·2023
Same author

Estimation of Ordinary Differential Equation Models for Gene Regulatory Networks Through Data Cloning.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2023
Same author

Phosphodiesterase 7B/microRNA-200c relationship regulates triple-negative breast cancer cell growth.

Oncogene·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.1K

A Gene Selection Method Considering Measurement Errors.

Hajoung Lee1, Jaejik Kim1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|November 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel gene selection method to address measurement errors in gene expression data. The approach reduces false positives and enhances stability for more accurate disease mechanism and drug discovery insights.

Keywords:
gene screeninggeneralized linear modelmeasurement errorregularization

More Related Videos

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
06:18

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

Published on: April 26, 2019

6.0K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

990

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.1K
Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
06:18

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

Published on: April 26, 2019

6.0K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

990

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Gene expression data analysis is crucial for understanding diseases and developing therapies.
  • Gene selection is vital but challenging due to data complexity, including ultra-high dimensionality, noise, and measurement errors.
  • Measurement errors in high-throughput experiments can lead to an increased number of falsely discovered genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a robust gene selection method that explicitly accounts for measurement errors.
  • To improve the accuracy and reliability of gene selection in the presence of experimental noise.
  • To reduce false positives in gene identification for better biological insights.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a gene selection technique utilizing generalized linear measurement error models.
  • Implementation of an iterative filtering and selection process designed to reach convergence.
  • Validation through simulation studies and application to a real-world lung cancer dataset.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively mitigates the impact of measurement errors on gene selection.
  • Demonstrated reduction in false positive discoveries compared to methods ignoring measurement errors.
  • Achieved stable and reliable gene selection results even with inherent data noise.

Conclusions:

  • The novel gene selection method offers a significant improvement for analyzing gene expression data with measurement errors.
  • This approach enhances the identification of relevant genes, contributing to more accurate disease mechanism studies and therapeutic development.
  • The method's stability and reduced false positive rate make it a valuable tool for genomic data analysis.