Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
Published on: March 12, 2018
Delivery of a novel intervention to facilitate liberation from mechanical ventilation in paediatric intensive care: A
Joanne Jordan1, Lyvonne Tume2,3, Mike Clarke4
1School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Open University, Milton Keynes, England.
Insights
This study reduced invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) duration in children by optimizing sedation and early liberation protocols. The intervention showed a small but significant decrease in ventilation time, highlighting the importance of clear decision pathways.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Clinical Trial Methodology
Background:
- Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients.
- Optimizing sedation and early liberation from mechanical ventilation can reduce ventilator duration.
- A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a multicenter trial to assess intervention delivery and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of an intervention aimed at optimizing sedation and facilitating early liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in children.
- To understand the process of intervention implementation and its relationship with trial outcomes through qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Main Methods:
- A stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial involving 10,495 children across 18 UK pediatric intensive care units.
- Intervention included sedation assessment/optimization and bedside screening for spontaneous breathing trials.
- Qualitative data from 193 staff interviews (thematic analysis) and quantitative adherence data (descriptive statistics) were collected.
Main Results:
- The intervention resulted in a statistically significant reduction in IMV duration (adjusted median difference -7.1 hours, p=0.01).
- Overall adherence to the intervention was 75%.
- Factors promoting use included ease, flexibility, clear responsibilities, decision pathways, and communication; barriers included routines, clinician preference, and lack of leadership.
Conclusions:
- The SANDWICH trial demonstrated a modest but significant reduction in IMV duration.
- Enhanced direction in decision-making, integration into unit routines, and leveraging advanced practitioners' skills could improve intervention effectiveness.
Background:
Prolonged mechanical ventilation increases the risk of mortality and morbidity. Optimising sedation and early testing for possible liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has been shown to reduce time on the ventilator. Alongside a multicentre trial of sedation and ventilation weaning, we conducted a mixed method process evaluation to understand how the intervention content and delivery was linked to trial outcomes.
Methods:
10,495 children admitted to 18 paediatric intensive care units (ICUs) in the United Kingdom participated in a stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial, with 1955 clinical staff trained to deliver the intervention. The intervention comprised assessment and optimisation of sedation levels, and bedside screening of respiratory parameters to indicate readiness for a spontaneous breathing trial prior to liberation from ventilation. 193 clinical staff were interviewed towards the end of the trial. Interview data were thematically analysed, and quantitative adherence data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results:
The intervention led to a reduced duration of IMV (adjusted median difference- 7.1 hours, 95% CI -9.6 to -5.3, p = 0.01). Overall intervention adherence was 75% (range 59-85%). Ease and flexibility of the intervention promoted it use; designated responsibilities, explicit pathways of decision-making and a shared language for communication fostered proactivity and consistency towards extubation. Delivery of the intervention was hindered by established hospital and unit organisational and patient care routines, clinician preference and absence of clinical leadership.
Conclusions:
The SANDWICH trial showed a significant, although small, reduction in duration of IMV. Findings suggest that greater direction in decision-making pathways, robust embedment of new practice in unit routine, and capitalising on the skills of Advanced Nurse Practitioners and physiotherapists would have contributed to greater intervention effect.
Trial Registration:
isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16998143.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

