Causal inference using observational intensive care unit data: a scoping review and recommendations for future
J M Smit1,2, J H Krijthe3, W M R Kant4
1Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.smit@erasmusmc.nl.
NPJ Digital Medicine
|November 27, 2023
Summary
This review highlights the critical need for robust causal inference models in artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical decision-making. Improving reporting standards for causal inference studies in intensive care units (ICUs) is essential for developing trustworthy AI tools.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Causal Inference
Background:
- Actionable artificial intelligence (AI) requires reliable models for causal inference to support clinical decision-making.
- Intensive care units (ICUs) present complex scenarios with time-varying treatments, necessitating advanced causal inference methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of studies using causal inference models in adult ICUs.
- To evaluate the reporting quality of these studies regarding target trial components and causal assumptions.
- To provide recommendations for enhancing future research practices.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search across multiple scientific databases (e.g., Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, arXiv).
- Inclusion of studies on causal inference models for time-varying treatments in adult ICUs.
- Data extraction on study settings, methodologies (G methods, reinforcement learning), treatment regimes (static, dynamic), target trial components, and causal assumptions.
Main Results:
- 79 studies met the inclusion criteria from 2184 titles.
- G methods (61%) and reinforcement learning (39%) were the primary methodologies.
- Significant gaps in reporting were identified: only 38% reported all target trial components, and 9% mentioned all causal assumptions.
Conclusions:
- Current reporting standards for causal inference models in ICU research are insufficient for developing actionable AI.
- Recommendations include clearly defining the causal question as a target trial emulation, employing appropriate methods, and rigorously assessing causal assumptions.
- Improving reporting quality is crucial for advancing AI in critical care settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Causality in Epidemiology
428
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
428
Observational Studies
8.7K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.7K
Data Collection by Observations
12.0K
Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the most widely used methods of data collection. It involves collecting data by observing the behavior and physical characteristics of a sample without making any modifications to the sample.
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
12.0K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
324
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
324
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
297
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
297
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
291
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
291


