Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

08:48
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Biomarkers for Detecting Human Sperm Functional Defects
Published on: April 21, 2022
2.5K
External quality assessment scheme for sperm DNA fragmentation: a pilot study in China
Yan Zheng1,2, Ying-Bi Wu1,2, Ye-Lin Jia1,2
1Department of Andrology/Sichuan Human Sperm Bank, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R. China.
Basic and Clinical Andrology
|November 28, 2023
Summary
This study established a feasible external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) detection. Participation in the SDF EQA program improved laboratory accuracy for SDF testing.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Andrology
- Laboratory Quality Management
Background:
- Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is a critical indicator of male reproductive health.
- Standardized methods for SDF detection are essential for accurate clinical interpretation.
- External quality assessment (EQA) programs are vital for ensuring laboratory performance and result consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish and assess the feasibility of an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) detection.
- To analyze abnormal SDF results and identify areas for laboratory improvement.
- To evaluate the impact of EQA participation on laboratory performance over time.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of an EQA program involving laboratories in China for SDF detection in 2021 and 2022.
- Distribution of multiple SDF samples for analysis using various detection methods.
- Statistical analysis of results, including coefficients of variation (CVs), to assess inter-laboratory variability.
- Comparison of results between sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) methods.
Main Results:
- High inter-laboratory variability (CVs ranging from 26.7% to 46.6%) was observed across four EQA samples.
- Coefficients of variation (CVs) were lower for samples with high SDF values compared to low SDF values.
- Participating laboratories showed improved performance, with decreased CVs for both low and high SDF samples from 2021 to 2022.
- No significant difference was found between SCSA and SCD methods regarding SDF detection variability.
Conclusions:
- The developed EQA scheme for SDF detection is feasible and effective.
- The EQA program has demonstrated a positive impact on improving laboratory accuracy in SDF testing.
- It is recommended that all laboratories performing SDF analysis participate in EQA to ensure reliable and accurate results.

