General surgery applicants report the impact of virtual interviews on their rank list and match

The transition to an all-virtual application cycle for General Surgery Match 2021 significantly altered interview day and the interactions of applicants with residency programs. We sought to evaluate the impact of a virtual match cycle on applicants' rank list and Match results.

We surveyed applicants who were offered an interview for a categorical general surgery residency position at our institution during the 2021 match season. Voluntary anonymous surveys were sent after the rank list deadline and again after the Match.

Out of 108 interviewees, 43 completed the survey (40%). Median age was 26, and 61% of respondents were male and 82% white, which skewed from our diverse interview pool. They completed a median of 17 interviews. 69% felt they had sufficient exposure to make their rank list, and this group reached statistically significant higher confidence in their decisions when compared with those who endorsed not having enough exposure to the residency programs (58% vs 42%, p = 0.02). Applicants cited the most influential interview day factors to be their interview with faculty and the virtual social with residents. Least important was their ability to assess the hospital facility. Among seven different program factors, comradery between faculty and residents (31%) and perceived happiness of the residents (18.6%) were most often selected most influential. Only 56% reported ranking all programs at which they interviewed. After submitting their rank list, 59% of applicants stated they had not visited the city of their top ranked program; however, post-match surveys revealed only 44% matched to a program in a city unknown to them. 57% of applicants stated they reached out to their top choice program with additional questions, but only 47% matched at one of those institutions.

Even in the constraints of the virtual interviews, most applicants felt they had sufficient exposure to programs to make their rank list. Applicants were willing to highly rank cities they had never visited and to reach out to programs but were ultimately less successful matching at those programs. Understanding what factors and communications most impact applicants and programs may lead to a more successful Match.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00071-8.