Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Determining the Optimal Treatment for Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Ying-Yu Wang1,2, Yu-Cheng Su1,2, Yu-Kang Tu3,4
1Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkuo, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Insights
The Ponseti method offers the best overall outcomes for treating infant clubfoot, balancing effectiveness with potential drawbacks. Individualized treatment plans are recommended for optimal results in congenital talipes equinovarus deformity.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Pediatric Surgery
- Biomechanical Engineering
Background:
- Clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus) is a common infant foot anomaly.
- Clinical consensus on optimal interventions, particularly those based on the Ponseti method, is lacking.
- This study systematically evaluates various treatments for idiopathic clubfoot.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of different interventions for treating idiopathic clubfoot.
- To identify the most effective treatment strategies based on current evidence.
- To inform clinical decision-making for clubfoot management.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across major databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL).
- Included were randomized controlled trials comparing interventions like the Ponseti method, accelerated Ponseti, Ponseti with Botox, Ponseti with TATT, Kite method, and surgery.
- Network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on Pirani score changes and ankle dorsiflexion.
Main Results:
- The Ponseti method demonstrated superior outcomes in Pirani score changes, ankle dorsiflexion, cast number, adverse events, and total complications.
- The accelerated Ponseti method showed advantages in reduced time in casts and lower tenotomy rates.
- Early tibialis anterior tendon transfer (TATT) was associated with the lowest relapse rate, while Ponseti with Botox injection minimized the need for additional major surgery.
Conclusions:
- The Ponseti method is generally the optimal treatment for idiopathic clubfoot, despite potential for longer casting times and higher rates of tenotomy, relapse, and revision surgery.
- Modified approaches offer specific advantages, such as reduced casting time or lower relapse rates.
- Individualized tailoring of clubfoot treatments is crucial for achieving the best patient outcomes.
Background:
Clubfoot, or congenital talipes equinovarus deformity, is a common anomaly affecting the foot in infants. However, clinical equipoise remains between different interventions, especially those based on the Ponseti method. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of the various interventions for treating idiopathic clubfoot.
Methods:
Searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL were conducted. Randomized controlled trials comparing different interventions, including the Ponseti method, accelerated Ponseti method, Ponseti method with botulinum toxin type A (Botox) injection, Ponseti method with early tibialis anterior tendon transfer (TATT), Kite method, and surgical treatment, were included. Network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. The primary outcomes were the change in total Pirani score and maximal ankle dorsiflexion. Secondary outcomes were the number of casts, time in casts, and rates of tenotomy, total complications, relapse, adverse events, and additional required major surgery.
Results:
Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 740 feet were included. According to the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve)-based relative ranking, the Ponseti method was associated with the best outcomes in terms of Pirani score changes, maximal ankle dorsiflexion, number of casts, adverse events, and total complications, whereas the accelerated Ponseti method was associated with the best outcomes in terms of time in casts and tenotomy rate. Early TATT ranked best in terms of relapse rate. The Ponseti method with Botox injection was associated with the best outcomes in terms of the need for additional major surgery.
Conclusions:
The NMAs suggest that the Ponseti method is the optimal treatment overall, despite potential drawbacks such as longer time in casts and higher rates of tenotomy, relapse, and the need for additional surgery compared with other modified approaches. Therefore, clinicians should consider how treatments can be tailored individually.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
04:42Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
02:15Predictive Measurement for Windlass Change in Length and Selected Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups