Correlation of Serum Albumin Levels With Laboratory Parameters in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis and Continuous...

Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a treatment option for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, with automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) being the two main modalities. APD has reported benefits such as reduced peritonitis rates, improved ultrafiltration, and enhanced quality of life. However, some studies have found potential negative consequences of APD, and the impact on survival outcomes is limited and contradictory. Selecting the appropriate PD modality for ESRD patients should be individualized based on various factors, including nutritional status, demographic factors, laboratory findings, and other outcomes. PD patients are at high risk of malnutrition, and serum albumin is commonly used as a marker of nutritional status. Continuous monitoring of laboratory values may be beneficial for identifying nutritional deficiencies in a timely manner. Methodology This prospective cohort study aimed to compare APD and CAPD modalities in relation to serum albumin levels, demographic factors, and other laboratory parameters. The sample consisted of patients with ESRD treated with PD, who were divided into two groups per baseline albumin level. The study collected data on demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, as well as comorbidities. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and statistical tests, such as the chi-square test and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), were conducted to determine significant associations and differences between variables. Results The study included a total of 85 patients with ESRD who required PD as a treatment modality. Among them, 71 patients were undergoing APD, and 14 patients were undergoing CAPD. The study found that there were no significant differences in demographic factors, laboratory parameters, or medical history parameters between APD and CAPD patients with different albumin levels. The patients were followed up for six months and laboratory parameters were evaluated. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that there were no significant variations in both APD and CAPD patients. However, Spearman's rank correlation test revealed statistically important correlations between albumin and some laboratory parameters in both APD and CAPD patients at different assessment stages, including hemoglobin, sodium, transferrin, uric acid, phosphate, total protein, cholesterol, and triglycerides (p < 0.05). Conclusions Serum albumin levels appeared to be unaffected by the choice of PD modality. There were significant correlations between serum albumin levels and specific laboratory findings, including total protein, across all assessment stages for both APD and CAPD patients. These findings underscore the importance of continuous laboratory monitoring for PD patients.