Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

05:50
Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
Published on: January 16, 2020
5.9K
How different types of environmentalists are perceived: changing perceptions by the feature
Karolin Kibele1, Miriam Rosa2, Milan Obaidi3,4
1Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Frontiers in Psychology
|November 29, 2023
Summary
Stereotypes about environmentalists can hinder engagement. This study found that perceived typicality and self-identification with environmentalists are influenced by specific attributes like gender, occupation, and behavior, offering insights for environmental messaging.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Environmental Psychology
- Communication Studies
Background:
- Stereotypes of environmentalists act as barriers to public engagement and identification with environmentalism.
- Limited understanding exists regarding specific environmentalist attributes influencing public perception and self-identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how various attributes of fictional environmentalist profiles impact public perceptions and self-identification.
- To address the knowledge gap concerning the distinct features of environmentalists that shape public opinion.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a conjoint experiment with 678 US residents.
- Analyzed reactions to fictional environmentalist profiles varying in gender, occupation, and pro-environmentalism type.
- Assessed influence on stereotypes (competence, friendliness, trustworthiness), perceived typicality, and self-identification.
Main Results:
- Profiles perceived as more typical environmentalists were described as women, Asian, cleaners or office clerks, politically moderate/liberal, and exhibiting private to moderate environmental behaviors.
- Participants most identified with profiles depicted as women, in cleaner occupations, and exhibiting private pro-environmental behaviors.
- Atypical profile descriptions positively influenced impressions when linked to private pro-environmental behaviors or cleaner occupations.
Conclusions:
- Findings offer insights into impression formation and the use of conjoint analyses in psychological research.
- Provides valuable input for the environmental movement on message framing, considering source and content relative to the audience.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Perception
1.6K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.6K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Naturalistic Observations
15.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.5K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K

