Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to 'Musical neurodynamics and the 'inner voice''.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Musical neurodynamics.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Hebbian learning with elasticity explains how the spontaneous motor tempo affects music performance synchronization.

PLoS computational biology·2023
Same author

Dynamic models for musical rhythm perception and coordination.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2023
Same author

Multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis of human-metronome phasing.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Neural Entrainment to Musical Pulse in Naturalistic Music Is Preserved in Aging: Implications for Music-Based Interventions.

Brain sciences·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

12.8K

Exploring the dynamics of intentional sensorimotor desynchronization using phasing performance in music.

Ji Chul Kim1

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action, Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.

Frontiers in Psychology
|November 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Intentional sensorimotor desynchronization, or phasing, involves controlled rhythmic decoupling. This study models non-expert phasing behavior, revealing successful phasing requires gradual phase shifts and tempo influences failure types.

Keywords:
coordination dynamicsdynamical systemsmusic performanceoscillator modelphasingrhythmic coordination

More Related Videos

Bouncing Ball with a Uniformly Varying Velocity in a Metronome Synchronization Task
05:04

Bouncing Ball with a Uniformly Varying Velocity in a Metronome Synchronization Task

Published on: September 21, 2017

6.0K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

12.8K
Bouncing Ball with a Uniformly Varying Velocity in a Metronome Synchronization Task
05:04

Bouncing Ball with a Uniformly Varying Velocity in a Metronome Synchronization Task

Published on: September 21, 2017

6.0K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Music Psychology
  • Dynamical Systems Theory

Background:

  • Humans naturally synchronize but can intentionally desynchronize.
  • Phasing in music involves controlled desynchronization between performers.
  • Previous studies explored expert phasing and simplified metronome tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate intentional sensorimotor desynchronization dynamics in non-experts.
  • Analyze phasing behavior against a metronome using a dynamical systems approach.
  • Model phasing performance to capture intrinsic and intentional control interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from a simplified phasing task against a metronome.
  • Classification of trials into successful, unsuccessful, or incomplete phasing laps.
  • Development of a dynamical model simulating an adaptive-frequency oscillator coupled to a stimulus.

Main Results:

  • Successful phasing necessitates a gradual increment in relative phase.
  • Different failure modes (unsuccessful vs. incomplete) correlate with metronome tempo.
  • The proposed model successfully replicates observed phasing behaviors and tempo effects.

Conclusions:

  • Phasing performance is governed by nonlinear dynamics of rhythmic coordination.
  • The musical technique of phasing offers a unique paradigm for studying human rhythmic behavior.
  • The model captures the interplay between intrinsic synchronization tendencies and intentional desynchronization control.