Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
[Predictive validity of Clinical Risk Groups in chronic patients in primary healthcare]
Manuel Sánchez Molla1, Inmaculada Candela García2, Domingo Orozco-Beltrán3
1Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, España; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Cap El Raval Elx-Centro, Elche, Alicante, España.
Objective:
To analyse a prediction model for admissions and hospital emergencies based on Clinical Risk Groups, in a population of complex chronic patients demanding primary care.
Design:
A multicentric retrospective observational study, of a cohort of chronic patients with comorbidity, from January until December 2013.
Place:
The study population was assigned to the Santa Pola and Raval health centres from the Health Department of Elche.
Participants:
Cohort of chronic patients with comorbidity, from January to December 2013.
Interventions:
Data about the number of admissions, reasons and complexity level associated with the admission were collected by the review of medical records.
Main Measures:
To determine the level of complexity, the classification included in the chronicity strategy of the Valencian Community based on Clinical Risk Groups was used.
Results:
Five hundred and four patients were recruited with a high complexity degree (N3) and 272 with moderate/low complexity (N1-N2). A higher comorbidity was observed in N3 patients with high complexity [Charlson 2.9 (DE 1.8) vs. 1.9 (DE 1.3); P<.001], and higher dependence degree for basic diary activities [Barthel 16.1 (n=81) vs. 7.3 (n=20); P<.001]. Association between the number of admissions [0.4 (DE 0.8) vs. 0.1 (DE 0.5); P<.001] and emergency visits [0.8 (DE 1.5) vs. 0.3 (DE 0.8), P<.001] was significatively higher in patients from N3 group than N1-N2 groups.
Conclusions:
The predictive capacity of CRG grouper showed high sensibility for the patient classification with a high degree of complexity. Its specificity and positive predictive value were lower for the association of the N3 complexity stratum.
More Related Videos
05:15Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups