Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Appropriate timing to perform an interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T cell
Rang Wang1, Yue Zhang1, Qiuping Fan1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT (I-PET) has a role in response evaluation and treatment guidance in patients with nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL). However, there was no agreement on the timing of I-PET performed, after chemotherapy or after chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to find the appropriate timing for I-PET by assessing the prognostic value of I-PET in response evaluation in ENKTL patients. Two hundred and twenty-seven ENKTL patients who had undergone I-PET were retrospectively included. All patients were grouped based on their therapeutic strategy received, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The Deauville 5-point score (DS) was used to interpret the I-PET images. The hazard ratio (HR) and C-index were used to measure the discriminatory and prognostic capacities of I-PET performed at different times. One hundred and six patients underwent the I-PET after chemotherapy (chemotherapy group), while I-PET was performed after chemoradiotherapy in 121 patients (chemoradiotherapy group). Eighty-seven patients were classified as metabolic remission (DS score of 1-3), while the other 140 were classified as non-metabolic remission (DS score of 4-5) according to the Deauville criteria. There were no significant survival differences between patients in metabolic remission and in non-metabolic remission in either progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.406) or overall survival (OS, p = 0.350). In the chemotherapy group, patients in metabolic remission had significantly superior PFS than patients in non-metabolic remission (p = 0.012). For OS, a discriminative trend was also found on the survival curve between patients in metabolic remission and in non-metabolic remission (p = 0.082). In the chemoradiotherapy group, there was no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.185) or OS (P = 0.627) between patients in metabolic remission and in non-metabolic remission. I-PET after chemotherapy yields higher discriminative power and has the ability for prognostic prediction in nasal-type ENKTL patients. I-PET after radiochemotherapy has no prognostic value. Thus, the appropriate timing for I-PET is after chemotherapy but before radiotherapy for response evaluation in nasal-type ENKTL patients.
Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT (I-PET) has a role in response evaluation and treatment guidance in patients with nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL). However, there was no agreement on the timing of I-PET performed, after chemotherapy or after chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to find the appropriate timing for I-PET by assessing the prognostic value of I-PET in response evaluation in ENKTL patients. Two hundred and twenty-seven ENKTL patients who had undergone I-PET were retrospectively included. All patients were grouped based on their therapeutic strategy received, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The Deauville 5-point score (DS) was used to interpret the I-PET images. The hazard ratio (HR) and C-index were used to measure the discriminatory and prognostic capacities of I-PET performed at different times. One hundred and six patients underwent the I-PET after chemotherapy (chemotherapy group), while I-PET was performed after chemoradiotherapy in 121 patients (chemoradiotherapy group). Eighty-seven patients were classified as metabolic remission (DS score of 1-3), while the other 140 were classified as non-metabolic remission (DS score of 4-5) according to the Deauville criteria. There were no significant survival differences between patients in metabolic remission and in non-metabolic remission in either progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.406) or overall survival (OS, p = 0.350). In the chemotherapy group, patients in metabolic remission had significantly superior PFS than patients in non-metabolic remission (p = 0.012). For OS, a discriminative trend was also found on the survival curve between patients in metabolic remission and in non-metabolic remission (p = 0.082). In the chemoradiotherapy group, there was no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.185) or OS (P = 0.627) between patients in metabolic remission and in non-metabolic remission. I-PET after chemotherapy yields higher discriminative power and has the ability for prognostic prediction in nasal-type ENKTL patients. I-PET after radiochemotherapy has no prognostic value. Thus, the appropriate timing for I-PET is after chemotherapy but before radiotherapy for response evaluation in nasal-type ENKTL patients.
More Related Videos
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
08:55A Practical Guide for the Production and PET/CT Imaging of 68Ga-DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Daily Clinical Practice
Published on: April 17, 2019