Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

61.2K
Overview
61.2K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.8K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

84.3K
Overview
84.3K
Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.3K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.3K
Genomics02:02

Genomics

36.4K
Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...
36.4K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

18.9K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
18.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Kaminari: a frugal colored index for approximate <i>k</i>-mer queries.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

VisPan: real-time visualisation of multiplex amplicon-based sequencing panels for rapid syndromic surveillance and pathogen detection.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

A versatile multi-components mixed model for bacterial-Genome Wide association studies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Data Structures to Represent a Set of <math><mi>k</mi></math> -long DNA Sequences.

ACM computing surveys·2026
Same author

High-quality metagenome assembly from nanopore reads with nanoMDBG.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Rapid, accurate long- and short-read mapping to large pangenome graphs with vg Giraffe.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic profiling of the host response in human malaria.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Mapping the landscape of allele-specific expression in porcine genomes.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Genomic sequence evolution underlying human neocortical interareal diversification.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Regulatory mechanisms driven by functional 3'-UTR variants in alcohol use disorder and related traits.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

A longitudinal single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of bovine placentation reveals dynamic cellular hierarchies and regulatory programs.

Genome biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K

Comparing methods for constructing and representing human pangenome graphs.

Francesco Andreace1,2, Pierre Lechat3, Yoann Dufresne4,3

  • 1Department of Computational Biology, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, F-75015, France. francesco.andreace@pasteur.fr.

Genome Biology
|December 1, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human pangenome graphs capture population diversity, but graph structures vary. This study compares five tools, revealing key differences in how they represent genetic variations to guide user selection.

Keywords:
AlgorithmsPangenomicsSequence analysisVariation graphsde Bruijn graphs

More Related Videos

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
09:37

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

9.8K
A Web Tool for Generating High Quality Machine-readable Biological Pathways
08:01

A Web Tool for Generating High Quality Machine-readable Biological Pathways

Published on: February 8, 2017

17.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K
Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
09:37

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

9.8K
A Web Tool for Generating High Quality Machine-readable Biological Pathways
08:01

A Web Tool for Generating High Quality Machine-readable Biological Pathways

Published on: February 8, 2017

17.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • A single reference genome is insufficient to represent human genetic diversity.
  • Pangenome graphs are emerging as a crucial data structure for incorporating population variation in genomic analyses.
  • Existing pangenome graph representations vary, necessitating an understanding of their differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct and compare the largest human pangenome graphs to date.
  • To evaluate the performance and output of state-of-the-art pangenome graph construction tools.
  • To elucidate the impact of different graph structures on representing human genetic variation.

Main Methods:

  • Collected publicly available high-quality human haplotypes.
  • Constructed pangenome graphs using five tools: Bifrost, mdbg, Minigraph, Minigraph-Cactus, and pggb.
  • Analyzed differences in graph structure and genetic loci representation across tools.

Main Results:

  • Generated the largest human pangenome graphs incorporating 52 individuals plus two references.
  • Identified significant variations in how different tools represent genetic variations.
  • Observed distinct differences in overall graph topology and specific genetic locus representation.

Conclusions:

  • Key differences exist between pangenome graph construction tools.
  • Understanding these differences is essential for selecting the appropriate pangenome graph for specific genomic applications.
  • This comparative analysis provides guidance for researchers utilizing pangenome graphs.