Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Using HFACS to understand human error in railway dispatcher performance: a study of proactive safety inspection
Zizheng Guo1,2,3,4, Huishan Pang1, Jingyu Zhang5,6
1School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Abstract:
This study analyzes 4,095 proactive safety inspection records obtained from a large dispatching centre by utilising the HFACS framework. These proactive safety inspection records offer comprehensive documentation of incidents, capturing major accidents and numerous minor discrepancies and lapses that often go unnoticed in accident reports. The analysis revealed that most incidents were attributed to unsafe actions, primarily skill-based errors and poor decision-making. Additionally, contributing factors such as adverse mental states, personal readiness, and crew resource management were found to play a significant role as preconditions for unsafe acts. Path analyses further established a significant correlation between factors such as unsafe supervision, preconditions for unsafe acts, and the occurrence of unsafe acts. In our discussion, we critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of proactive safety inspection records in safety research. Moreover, we emphasise these findings' potential to enhance safety within the railway industry.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Rate
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Load-frequency control

