Accuracy of a Single Financial Security Question to Screen for Social Needs

Janel Hanmer1, Kristin N Ray2, Kelsey Schweiberger2

  • 1Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Pediatrics
|December 1, 2023
PubMed

Insights

A single financial stress question is not a reliable prescreen for social needs like food insecurity or housing instability in pediatric care. It misses a significant percentage of families needing support, indicating its low sensitivity.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric primary care
  • Social determinants of health
  • Health equity

Background:

  • Clinical guidelines recommend screening for social needs during patient encounters.
  • Multi-item questionnaires for social needs assessment can increase patient burden.
  • Exploring single-question screeners is crucial for efficient clinical workflows.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a single financial stress question as a prescreen for food insecurity, housing instability, and transportation needs.
  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a financial stress question in identifying other social needs.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of medical record data from children under 11 years old.
  • Data collected from 45 primary pediatric care offices in 2022.
  • Automated social needs screening via patient portal, tablet, or verbal interaction.

Main Results:

  • 17% of respondents reported at least one social need (food, housing, or transportation).
  • The financial stress question showed a sensitivity of 0.788 for any social need.
  • This single question prescreen would miss 9.7% of food insecurity, 22.6% of housing instability, and 33.0% of transportation needs.

Conclusions:

  • A single question about financial stress is not a suitable prescreen for identifying food insecurity, housing instability, or transportation needs.
  • The low sensitivity of the financial stress question limits its utility in a prescreening strategy.
  • Further research is needed to identify more effective brief screening tools for social needs.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
356
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Sign Test for Median of Single Population01:20

Sign Test for Median of Single Population

In general, the sign test serves as a nonparametric method to test hypotheses about the median of a single population when the data does not follow a known distribution. This simplicity makes it particularly useful for small sample sizes or when the assumptions of parametric tests cannot be met. The process begins with identifying a null hypothesis, typically stating that the population median equals a specific value. The alternative hypothesis could be that the median is either not equal to,...
116
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
135