Non-Pauli Errors Can Be Efficiently Sampled in Qudit Surface Codes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Silicon Metal-oxide-semiconductor Quantum Dots for Single-electron Pumping
Published on: June 3, 2015
Yue Ma1, Michael Hanks1, M S Kim1
1QOLS, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Surface codes are the most promising candidates for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Single qudit errors are typically modeled as Pauli operators, to which general errors are converted via randomizing methods. In this Letter, we quantify remaining correlations after syndrome measurement for a qudit 2D surface code subject to non-Pauli errors via loops on the lattice, using percolation theory. Below the error correction threshold, remaining correlations are sparse and locally constrained. Syndromes for qudit surface codes are therefore efficiently samplable for non-Pauli errors, independent of the exact forms of the error and decoder.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Theorem
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Random Sampling Method
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Sampling Distribution
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

