Ex Vivo Comparison of the Elastic Properties of Vascular Substitutes Used for Pulmonary Artery Replacement

Study aims were to evaluate the elastic properties of vascular substitutes frequently used for pulmonary artery (PA) replacement, and then to compare their compliance and stiffness indexes to those of human PA.

A bench-test pulsatile flow experiment was developed to perfuse human cadaveric vascular substitutes (PA, thoracic aorta, human pericardial conduit), bovine pericardial conduit, and prosthetic vascular substitutes (polytetrafluorethylene and Dacron grafts) at a flow and low pulsed pressure mimicking pulmonary circulation. Intraluminal pressure was measured. An ultrasound system with an echo-tracking function was used to monitor vessel wall movements. The diameter, compliance, and stiffness index were calculated for each vascular substitute and compared to the human PA at mean pressures ranging from 10 to 50 mmHg.

The compliance of the PA and the thoracic aorta were similar at mean physiological pressures of 10 mmHg and 20 mmHg. The PA was significantly less compliant than the aorta at mean pressures above 30 mmHg (P = 0.017). However, there was no difference in stiffness index between the two substitutes over the entire pressure range. Compared to the PA, human pericardial conduit was less compliant at 10 mmHg (P = 0.033) and stiffer at 10 mmHg (P = 0.00038) and 20 mmHg (P = 0.026). Bovine pericardial conduit and synthetic prostheses were significantly less compliant and stiffer than the PA for mean pressures of 10, 20, and 30 mmHg. There were no differences at 40 and 50 mmHg.

Allogenic arterial grafts appear to be the most suitable vascular substitutes in terms of compliance and stiffness for PA replacement.