Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Retrograde thoracic spinal cord stimulation paddle placement for complex persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2
Bernardo Assumpcao de Monaco1, Guilherme Santos Piedade1, Ahmed Doomi1
1Neurological Surgery Department, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Background:
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a cost-effective option for treating refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-2). For patients with extensive spine instrumentation including the thoraco-lumbar junction, percutaneous placement of SCS leads is usually not an option being paddle leads typically implanted anterograde. Paddle lead placement will be particularly challenging in more complex cases when the instrumentation covers the targeted level. To overcome this barrier, we studied using a retrograde approach to reach the sweet spot, facilitate the placement, and reduce associated risks.
Objectives:
To study the use of retrograde SCS paddle as a placement method to optimize the spinal cord target and reduce the risks of conventional placement in complex cases.
Study Design:
Case series and technical note.
Methods:
We present three cases of thoracic retrograde SCS paddle lead placement cases, detailing patient selection, operative technique, and outcome. All the cases had extensive instrumentation to the thoraco-lumbar spine, and one had additional spinal canal stenosis. The surgical procedure entailed a retrograde midthoracic inter-laminar approach, flavectomy, and caudal placement of the paddle lead with intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) guidance for functional midline determination.
Results:
All the cases had a successful lead placement over the sweet spot without complications. The same approach was used to decompress a focal spinal stenosis in one case. One case had significantly improved pain and hence underwent a pulse generator implant. The other cases had non-satisfactory pain control and were explanted.
Limitations:
These case description could guide technical procedural steps, however, a larger number of such cases would be needed to describe further technical nuances.
Conclusions:
We demonstrated that placing SCS paddle leads via retrograde midthoracic approach with IONM guidance is safe. This procedure should be an option for SCS paddle implants in patients with posterior spinal fusion encompassing the intended targeted spinal stimulation level.
