Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

130
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
130
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

7.8K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
7.8K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Intraoperative hemodynamics and anesthetic implications in superobese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2026
Same author

Unlocking growth potential: Ivacaftor therapy and developmental gains in lung and height in a cohort study of children and young adults with cystic fibrosis.

The European respiratory journal·2026
Same author

The Electrophysiology of Disease Remission in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy.

European journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Type 1 Error Rates in Duplex Sequencing for Mutagenicity Testing Using Vehicle Control Data and Simulation Analyses.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same author

Can environmental, social, and governance rating divergence harm the green total factor productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed firms.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same author

Timing of Hydroxocobalamin Administration for Cardiopulmonary Bypass-Induced Vasoplegia Syndrome: More Questions Than Answers.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Engineering Education via WebVR-Based Online Laboratories
04:15

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Engineering Education via WebVR-Based Online Laboratories

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K

Toward implementing virtual control groups in nonclinical safety studies.

Emily Golden1, David Allen2, Alexander Amberg3

  • 1Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

ALTEX
|December 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Historical animal toxicity data can create virtual control groups, reducing animal use in safety studies. Further development requires addressing data management, statistical methods, and validation to ensure reliable results for human risk assessment.

Keywords:
data sharinghistorical control datareduction of animal useregulatory acceptancestatistical analysis

More Related Videos

Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality
10:38

Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality

Published on: August 9, 2010

21.0K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Engineering Education via WebVR-Based Online Laboratories
04:15

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Engineering Education via WebVR-Based Online Laboratories

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K
Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality
10:38

Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality

Published on: August 9, 2010

21.0K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Animal Welfare
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Historical control data in animal toxicity studies are primarily used for comparative analysis.
  • The controlled nature of these studies suggests potential for using historical data to form virtual control groups.
  • Implementing virtual control groups could significantly reduce the number of animals used in safety testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the feasibility and prerequisites for utilizing historical control data to establish virtual control groups.
  • To identify necessary data collection, curation, statistical evaluation, and validation strategies.
  • To assess the potential of virtual control groups to replace concurrent controls and reduce animal usage.

Main Methods:

  • A workshop convened stakeholders from pharmaceutical, chemical industries, academia, regulatory bodies (FDA), CROs, and NGOs.
  • Summarized European initiatives for centralized animal control data sharing and curation.
  • Explored initial approaches for matching criteria between virtual and treatment groups and qualification strategies.

Main Results:

  • The report outlines current efforts in data centralization and curation for animal control data.
  • Identified initial methods for matching virtual controls to study treatment arms.
  • Began reflecting on qualification procedures and potential challenges associated with virtual control groups.

Conclusions:

  • Virtual control groups offer a promising avenue for reducing animal use in toxicity studies.
  • Careful consideration of data management, statistical methods, and validation is crucial for successful implementation.
  • Ongoing collaboration and development are needed to refine the concept and ensure its reliability for regulatory use.