Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
Published on: March 14, 2017
Smartphone use for Paediatric Calculations in Emergencies (SPaCE)
Jordan Evans1, Zoe Morrison2, Rhian Thomas-Turner2
1Paediatric Emergency Department, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK jordan.evans@wales.nhs.uk.
Background:
The preparation for critically ill children involves calculating drug and fluid volumes using the commonly taught WETFLAG (weight, energy, endotracheal tube, fluids, lorazepam, adrenaline, glucose) acronym. While smartphone applications (apps) are increasingly used for these calculations in clinical practice, limited studies have explored their accuracy and safety.
Aim:
To assess the accuracy of three calculation methods for paediatric emergency drug doses and fluid volumes: a smartphone app, reference charts and traditional calculation methods. The secondary aims were to investigate the effect on the time taken and self-reported stress levels.
Methods:
A convenience sample of healthcare professionals from four hospitals contributed. Participants calculated drug and fluid doses for fictional patients using the three different methods. The method and case order were randomised centrally. The study recorded the number of errors made during the calculations, healthcare professionals' self-reported stress levels on a scale of 0 (no stress) to 10 (maximum stress) and the time taken for each case. The app was developed at the direct request of the study team.
Results:
Ninety-six participants calculated values for six fictional cases, resulting in 576 calculations. Traditional calculation methods showed a statistically significant higher rate of error compared with the use of a smartphone app or reference charts (mean=1, 0, 0, respectively). The smartphone app outperformed both traditional calculation methods and reference charts for time taken and user-reported stress levels.
Conclusions:
Traditional methods of 'WETFLAG' drug and fluid calculations are associated with a statistically significant increased risk of error compared with the use of reference charts or smartphone app. The smartphone app proved significantly faster and less stressful to use compared with traditional calculation methods or reference charts.
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:

