Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
The Roles of Protocols and Protocolization in Improving Outcome From Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Randall M Chesnut1,2,3,4, Nancy Temkin1,5, Walter Videtta6
1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle , Washington , USA.
Implementing the Consensus REVised Imaging and Clinical Examination (CREVICE) protocol significantly improved outcomes for severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) patients managed without intracranial pressure monitoring, demonstrating the value of protocolization.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
Background:
- Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) management often lacks standardized protocols, particularly in resource-limited settings without intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring.
- Previous studies suggested a benefit from an ad hoc Imaging and Clinical Examination (ICE) protocol for sTBI.
- The influence of protocolization versus the specific protocol in improving outcomes remained unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether adopting the Consensus REVised Imaging and Clinical Examination (CREVICE) protocol improved outcomes in sTBI patients.
- To determine if improvements were directly due to the CREVICE protocol or indirectly through the process of protocolization.
- To evaluate the CREVICE protocol in centers managing sTBI without ICP monitoring.
Main Methods:
- A Phase-II sequential parallel-cohort study was conducted.
- Patients with sTBI (older than 13 years) presenting within 24 hours of injury were included.
- The study compared the adoption of the CREVICE protocol from either no protocol or a previous protocol (ICE) in South American centers without ICP monitoring.
Main Results:
- Adopting CREVICE from no protocol significantly improved 6-month extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE), reduced mortality, and enhanced orientation.
- Adopting CREVICE from the ICE protocol also showed significant benefits in GOSE, mortality, and orientation.
- Patients previously managed with ICE and then adopting CREVICE demonstrated superior GOSE compared to those adopting CREVICE from no protocol.
Conclusions:
- The CREVICE protocol is a viable and effective strategy for managing adult sTBI without ICP monitoring.
- Protocolization, as exemplified by the CREVICE protocol, offers significant benefits for sTBI management regardless of resource availability.
- Centers managing sTBI without ICP monitoring are strongly encouraged to adopt or adapt the CREVICE protocol.
More Related Videos
09:29Controlled Cortical Impact Model of Mouse Brain Injury with Therapeutic Transplantation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cells
Published on: July 10, 2019
07:21Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022