Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diffusion network model analysis of multimodal neuroimaging reveals differential patterns of brain disease propagation in four subgroups of ALS patients.

Brain imaging and behavior·2026
Same author

The Tuesday lessons of ALS.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same author

Detour ahead: possible causes of corticospinal tract truncation in upper motor neuron-predominant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Brain communications·2025
Same author

Shared burden of ultra-rare genetic variants across a spectrum of motor neuron diseases.

Translational neurodegeneration·2025
Same author

Predicting Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mortality With Machine Learning in Diverse Patient Databases.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same author

Predictive Analysis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Progression and Mortality in a Clinic Cohort From Singapore.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same journal

Feasibility and sensitivity of a multimodal digital endpoint panel for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective cohort study.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
Same journal

Reduced penetrance in genetic ALS/FTD spectrum disorders: implications for genetic counseling, predictive testing and treatment.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
Same journal

An open-label Phase 2a study of fasudil in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: safety and exploratory endpoints.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
Same journal

Noninvasive assessment of cardiovascular autonomic reflexes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
Same journal

The connection between unproven stem cell-based interventions and complementary and alternative medicine in crowdfunding for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
Same journal

Thinning of the oral motor cortex is linked to impaired speech in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Clinical Testing and Spinal Cord Removal in a Mouse Model for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:35

Clinical Testing and Spinal Cord Removal in a Mouse Model for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: March 17, 2012

28.1K

Predicting amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) progression with machine learning.

Muzammil Arif Din Abdul Jabbar1,2, Ling Guo3, Sonakshi Nag3

  • 1Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration
|December 5, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) progression using patient data. Shorter observation periods and identified predictors may streamline clinical trials and reveal new therapeutic targets.

Keywords:
ALSmachine learningmotor neurone disease

More Related Videos

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
06:49

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS

Published on: October 6, 2015

19.7K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Clinical Testing and Spinal Cord Removal in a Mouse Model for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:35

Clinical Testing and Spinal Cord Removal in a Mouse Model for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: March 17, 2012

28.1K
A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
06:49

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS

Published on: October 6, 2015

19.7K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease.
  • Predicting ALS progression is crucial for clinical trial design and patient management.
  • Current prediction methods may not fully leverage the potential of machine learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models for predicting ALS progression.
  • To assess the impact of varying observation and prediction window lengths on model performance.
  • To identify key predictors of ALS disease progression.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from 5030 patients in the PRO-ACT database.
  • Modeled ALS progression (fast vs. non-fast) using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Bayesian Long Short Term Memory (BLSTM).
  • Evaluated model performance using AUROC and compared across different observation lengths (single visit to 12 months).

Main Results:

  • ML models achieved AUROC of 0.570-0.748, performing comparably to clinician assessments.
  • Model performance was consistent across observation lengths but improved with longer prediction windows.
  • Identified 21 predictors of progression, including disease onset, ALSFRS-R, forced vital capacity, phosphorus, chloride, and albumin.
  • BLSTM models showed higher confidence in predictions for certain samples.
  • Patient screening via models could hypothetically reduce clinical trial sizes by 18.3%.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models offer a viable approach for predicting ALS progression.
  • Clinical trial observation periods could potentially be shortened to a single visit, reducing trial sizes.
  • Identified predictors may serve as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ALS.
  • BLSTM confidence levels enhance the trustworthiness of predictions for clinical decision-making.