Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Variation in Length of Stay by Level of Neonatal Care Among Moderate and Late Preterm Infants
Lana Ismail1, Allison Markowsky1, Charity Adusei-Baah1
1Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Insights
Length of stay for moderate and late preterm infants varies significantly by hospital level of neonatal care. Level II hospitals showed the most variation, indicating a need for standardized care protocols.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Pediatric hospital outcomes
- Healthcare quality and safety
Background:
- Moderate and late preterm infants represent a growing population with complex care needs.
- Standardized care protocols for these infants are currently lacking.
- Variations in length of stay (LOS) may impact resource utilization and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze variations in LOS for moderate (32-33 weeks gestational age [GA]) and late (34-36 weeks GA) preterm infants.
- To compare LOS across different levels of neonatal care (II, III, and IV) and within hospitals of the same level.
- To identify factors contributing to LOS variability in this population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2019 Kid's Inpatient Database.
- Inclusion of hospitalizations for moderate and late preterm infants.
- Statistical analysis to compare adjusted LOS, accounting for patient-level and hospital-level factors.
Main Results:
- The study included over 217,000 moderate and late preterm infants across level II, III, and IV hospitals.
- Patient and hospital-level factors significantly influenced LOS.
- Level II hospitals exhibited the greatest variability in LOS for 34- to 36-week GA infants; significant variation also observed between level III and IV hospitals for 32-week GA infants.
Conclusions:
- The level of neonatal care is associated with significant variation in LOS for moderate and late preterm infants, even after adjusting for clinical severity.
- Level II neonatal care facilities demonstrated the highest degree of LOS variability.
- Standardization of care within level II hospitals may be a key area for quality improvement initiatives.
Background And Objectives:
Moderate and late preterm infants are a growing subgroup of neonates with increased care needs after birth, yet standard protocols are lacking. We aim to describe variation in length of stay (LOS) by gestational age (GA) across hospitals within the same level of neonatal care and between different levels of neonatal care.
Methods:
Retrospective cohort study of hospitalizations for moderate (32-33 weeks GA) and late (34-36 weeks GA) preterm infants in 2019 Kid's Inpatient Database. We compared adjusted LOS in this cohort and evaluated variation within hospitals of the same level and across different levels of neonatal care.
Results:
This study includes 217 051 moderate (26.2%) and late (73.8%) preterm infants from level II (19.7%), III (66.3%), and IV (11.1%) hospitals. Patient-level (race and ethnicity, primary payor, delivery type, multiple gestation, birth weight) and hospital-level (birth region, level of neonatal care) factors were significantly associated with LOS. Adjusted mean LOS varied for hospitals within the same level of neonatal care with level II hospitals showing the greatest variability among 34- to 36- week GA infants when compared with level III and IV hospitals (P < .01). LOS also varied significantly between levels of neonatal care with the greatest variation (0.9 days) seen in 32-week GA between level III and level IV hospitals.
Conclusions:
For moderate and late preterm infants, the level of neonatal care was associated with variation in LOS after adjusting for clinical severity. Hospitals providing level II neonatal care showed the greatest variation and may provide an opportunity to standardize care.
Related Concept Videos
Midrange
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to...
Regression Toward the Mean
Restorative Care

