Medicaid Insurance is Associated With Decreased MRI Use for Ankle Sprains Compared With Private Insurance: A

Thompson Zhuang1, Nicholas Vandal, Bijan Dehghani

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Patients with Medicaid had lower odds of receiving an MRI for ankle sprains but higher odds of surgery after MRI compared to privately insured patients. This highlights disparities in advanced imaging use and subsequent care.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Economics

Background:

  • Advanced imaging like MRI is costly, leading to potential healthcare disparities based on socioeconomic factors.
  • Ankle sprains are common injuries where MRI utilization can vary, including underuse and overuse.
  • Understanding socioeconomic associations with MRI use for ankle sprains is crucial for equitable, high-value care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) use for ankle sprains differs by insurance type.
  • To determine if patients receiving an MRI have higher odds of undergoing ankle surgery, controlling for confounding variables.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 3,185,459 eligible patients diagnosed with ankle sprains between 2011-2019 from a large patient records database.
  • Comparison of ankle MRI use within 12 months post-diagnosis across Medicaid, private, and Medicare Advantage insurance groups.
  • Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, region, and comorbidity burden to assess associations.

Main Results:

  • Patients with Medicaid insurance had significantly lower odds of receiving an ankle MRI compared to those with private insurance (OR 0.60).
  • Patients with Medicaid who received an MRI had substantially higher adjusted odds of undergoing subsequent ankle surgery (OR 23) than privately insured patients (OR 12.7).
  • Despite low absolute MRI use, significant relative variations by insurance type were observed, potentially impacting tens of thousands of patients.

Conclusions:

  • Substantial disparities in ankle MRI utilization exist based on insurance type, suggesting potential inequities in care.
  • Decreased appropriate MRI use in Medicaid patients and potential overuse in privately insured patients warrant further investigation.
  • Clinical practice guidelines and stricter insurance gatekeeping may be necessary to reduce unwarranted variations in MRI use for ankle sprains.