Comparison of Risk Factors Between Syndesmotic Screws With and Without Breakage

Background Screw fixation continues to be a commonly used treatment for syndesmotic disruption; however, screw breakage remains a complication post-fixation. Despite this complication, investigation on the variability of surgical placement in conjunction with syndesmotic screw characteristics affecting breakage has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study is to compare patients with syndesmotic screw breakage versus those with intact screws based on surgically controlled variables. Methods A total of 176 patients and 260 syndesmotic screws were included in the study, 88 patients each with and without broken syndesmotic screws. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent syndesmotic screw fixation was performed. Patients with syndesmotic screw breakage were compared to those with intact screws. Screw width and length, the number of screws used, fracture type, and the number of cortices for fixation were all collected. Further analysis included radiographic measurement of syndesmotic screw angle and height of placement above the tibial plafond. Results Decreased screw width, increased number of screws used, and younger age were all associated with increased rates of screw breakage (p < .001, p = .019, p = 0.020). No statistical difference was appreciated between groups based on screw length, number of cortices used, or angle relative to the tibial plafond (p = .2432, p = .4699, p = .9233). Conclusion Higher placement of syndesmotic screws above the tibiotalar joint, specifically greater than 20 mm above the tibial plafond, increases the screw breakage rate. Decreased screw width, increasing numbers of screws used, and younger age were all also associated with increased rates of screw breakage. No difference was appreciated based on the screw angle relative to the tibial plafond.