What does better look like in individuals with severe neurodevelopmental impairments? A qualitative descriptive study

Jenny Downs1,2, Natasha N Ludwig3, Mary Wojnaroski4

  • 1Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA, 6872, Australia. jenny.downs@telethonkids.org.au.

Insights

Parents identified meaningful functional changes in children with Developmental Epileptic Encephalopathies (DEEs) to guide clinical trial participation. These changes impact quality of life and daily care, varying by developmental level and trial type.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Clinical Outcome Assessment
  • Qualitative Research

Background:

  • Limited psychometric data exists for outcome measures in children with Developmental Epileptic Encephalopathies (DEEs).
  • There is a lack of data describing meaningful change in functional abilities for children with DEEs.
  • Understanding parent perceptions is crucial for designing effective clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore parent perceptions of important functional differences in children with DEEs.
  • To identify functional changes that would guide parent participation in clinical trials.
  • To inform the development of outcome measures for DEE clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews with 10 families of children with SCN2A-DEE.
  • Interviews focused on four functional domains: gross motor, fine motor, communication, and activities of daily living.
  • Directed content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data on perceived meaningful changes.

Main Results:

  • Meaningful differences varied based on the child's developmental level and the type of clinical trial (traditional therapy vs. gene therapy).
  • Parents described smaller developmental steps as meaningful for children with more limited skills.
  • Meaningful changes were linked to improved quality of life and easier daily care for the child.

Conclusions:

  • Meaningful change thresholds for DEEs remain unevaluated in existing literature.
  • This qualitative study provides a preliminary foundation for future research.
  • Future studies should aim to determine quantitative values for meaningful change to interpret clinical outcome assessments in DEE populations.
Abstract