Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025
Author Spotlight: Improving Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Surgical Accuracy and Efficiency Through Advanced Puncture Techniques
Published on: August 9, 2024
Risk Factors for New Adjacent and Remote Vertebral Fracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
Ke Gong1, Mengchen Song1, Chunfeng Shang1
1Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Objective:
To analyze the risk factors of new adjacent vertebral fractures (AVF) and remote vertebral fractures (RVF) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
Methods:
Patients who underwent additional PVP for new OVCFs were enrolled. In addition, we set a 1:1 age-, sex-, surgical segment-, and surgical date-matched control group, in which patients underwent PVP without new OVCFs. Data on body mass index, occurrence time of second PVP, vertebral computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield Unit (HU) at the fracture adjacent segment, and RVF segment were collected.
Results:
A total of 44 patients who underwent additional PVP for new OVCFs at our hospital were included. AVF occurred significantly earlier than RVF (13.5 ± 14.1 vs. 30.4 ± 20.1 months, P = 0.007). Compared to the control group, the AVF segment CT HU was significantly lower in patients with AVF (28.7 ± 16.7 vs. 61.3 ± 14.7, P = 0.000), while there was no significant difference between patients with RVF and control group including both adjacent and RVF segment CT HU. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a cutoff value of 43 for using adjacent segment CT HU to differentiate patients with AVF from controls, with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88.9%.
Conclusions:
Our study showed that the risk factors for AVF and RVF after PVP surgery were different. The occurrence of AVF was earlier and associated with low adjacent segment CT HU values, whereas the preoperative CT HU in both adjacent and RVF segments was not found to be associated with RVF.
