Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

AIDS legislation--turning up the heat?

M D Kirby

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |December 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    This paper examines legal and legislative responses to the spread of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), contrasting historical public hysteria with epidemic responses. It suggests tailored legal interventions based on disease magnitude, cure availability, and intervention goals to prevent injustice.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    HIV/AIDS: the twenty injunctions of London summary of the conference.

    International journal of STD & AIDS·1996
    Same author

    The economic rationalists strike again.

    The Medical journal of Australia·1995
    Same author

    A patient's right of access to medical records.

    The Journal of contemporary health law and policy·1995
    Same author

    Reproductive technology and law reform.

    The Medical journal of Australia·1994
    Same author

    Colloquium: AIDS, Health and Human Rights, Fondation Marcel Mérieux, Institut des Sciences du Vivant, Annecy, France, 18-20 June 1993.

    AIDS care·1994
    Same author

    Bioethical decisions and opportunity costs.

    The Journal of contemporary health law and policy·1987

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health Law
    • Epidemic Response
    • Legal History

    Background:

    • The paper analyzes legislative and legal reactions to the spread of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
    • It contextualizes AIDS within Australia's history of epidemic-related public hysteria.
    • The study contrasts AIDS hysteria with responses to previous epidemics over two centuries.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To categorize and analyze legislative and legal responses to the spread of AIDS.
    • To evaluate the historical approaches taken by lawmakers, ranging from severe to minimal intervention.
    • To propose criteria for determining appropriate legal and legislative responses to epidemics.

    Main Methods:

    • Historical analysis of legislative and legal documents related to AIDS.
    • Comparative analysis of public and legislative responses to past epidemics in Australia.
    • Categorization of legal interventions into 'full blast,' 'moderate heat,' and 'low key' approaches.

    Main Results:

    • Legislative responses to AIDS varied significantly, categorized by intervention intensity.
    • Historical parallels were drawn between public hysteria during the AIDS epidemic and previous epidemics.
    • The study identified a spectrum of legal approaches, from aggressive to minimal intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • Appropriate legal responses to epidemics like AIDS should consider disease magnitude, progression, and treatment availability.
    • Overreactions in legal interventions can lead to social disruption and personal injustice.
    • A nuanced approach, considering specific factors, is crucial for effective and equitable epidemic management.
    Keywords:
    Health Care and Public Health

    Related Experiment Videos