Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research on human embryos--a justification.

J Brown

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |December 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Arguments against embryo experimentation are philosophically weak, similar to arguments against abortion. This paper advocates for broader public understanding and acceptance of embryo research, challenging existing ethical frameworks.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Learning disabilities. Adapt and survive.

    Nursing times·1992
    Same author

    Intracellular regulation of cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components in murine B16 melanoma cells.

    Melanoma research·1992
    Same author

    The effect of chewing gum use on in situ enamel lesion remineralization.

    Journal of dental research·1992
    Same author

    Pick's disease.

    Bailliere's clinical neurology·1992
    Same author

    A prospective cytogenetic study of 36 cases of DiGeorge syndrome.

    American journal of human genetics·1992
    Same author

    Beliefs and behavioral intentions regarding human immunodeficiency virus testing among New York City runaways.

    The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine
    • Reproductive Ethics

    Background:

    • The moral status of embryos is a contentious issue in public and philosophical discourse.
    • Existing arguments against embryo experimentation, including those by Ian Kennedy, warrant critical examination.
    • The Warnock Report's conclusions on embryo research face ethical scrutiny.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze common arguments opposing embryo experimentation.
    • To evaluate the logical consistency of ethical objections to embryo research.
    • To advocate for increased public awareness and acceptance of ethical embryo research.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical arguments.
    • Critical review of literature on embryo status and experimentation.
    • Comparative ethical assessment of embryo research and abortion laws.

    Main Results:

    • Arguments against intentional embryo creation for research are not demonstrably sound.
    • The ethical permissibility of embryo research is linked to the permissibility of liberal abortion laws.
    • Current ethical justifications for restricting embryo research are found to be insufficient.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical objections to embryo experimentation lack sufficient philosophical grounding.
    • Permitting embryo research requires a broader public discourse and understanding.
    • The ethical debate necessitates a re-evaluation of embryo's moral status in relation to reproductive rights.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionPhilosophical ApproachWarnock Committee

    Related Experiment Videos