Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Methods for using Bing's AI-powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review
James Edward Hill1, Catherine Harris1, Andrew Clegg1
1Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
This study explores using Bing AI as a second reviewer for data extraction in systematic reviews. AI can assist human reviewers, saving time and resources, but requires further validation before replacing traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Systematic Review Methodology
Background:
- Data extraction in systematic reviews is labor-intensive.
- Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer automation potential.
- Enhancing efficiency and reliability in systematic reviews is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and demonstrate a method using Bing AI as a secondary reviewer for data extraction.
- To evaluate the potential of AI in verifying and enhancing data extracted by human reviewers.
- To provide a cost-effective solution for resource-limited systematic reviews.
Main Methods:
- A worked example detailing the use of Bing AI Chat to extract study characteristics from PDF documents.
- Instructing AI to populate data into a table for comparison with human-extracted data.
- Utilizing Microsoft Edge as a platform for AI-assisted verification.
Main Results:
- Bing AI can be instructed to extract specific data items from documents.
- The AI-assisted method offers an additional layer of verification for data extraction.
- This approach may be beneficial for reviewers with limited resources or experience.
Conclusions:
- Bing AI shows promise as a supplementary tool for data extraction in systematic reviews.
- It can enhance verification processes, especially when resources are scarce.
- Further research is needed to validate AI's accuracy and efficiency against established double-extraction methods.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
07:50A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Archival Research
Blind Procedures
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials