Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2026
A Tandem Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Metabolite Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus
Published on: March 28, 2017
Quality Evaluation of Gentamicin Sulfate Reference Standards in Japanese Pharmacopoeia Using Hydrophilic Interaction
Keiko Maekawa1, Ryuichi Sawa2, Mari Matsui3
1Doshisha Women's College of Liberal Arts, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Analytical Chemistry, 97-1 Minamihokodate Kodo Kyotanabe, Kyoto 610-0395, Japan.
Background:
Through the recent development of analytical technology, antibiotics quantification in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP) has changed from traditional microbiological assays to physicochemical methods with high specificity and precision. However, for several multicomponent antibiotics without typical UV absorption, potency cannot be directly determined using instrumental methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography; therefore, traditional microbiological assays are still used. Gentamicin sulfate (GmS), which consists of three major components, C1, C1a, and C2, is such a typical antibiotic, and its antimicrobial potency continues to be assayed using microbiological methods in JP monographs. Introduction of a physicochemical assay for GmS is needed to help ensure its quality and quantity.
Objective:
This study aimed to develop quality control measures for GmS that could be complementary to quantitative assays and purity tests specified in the JP.
Methods:
For each gentamicin C component (C1, C2, and C1a), theoretical potencies were determined based on the quantitative relationship between purity and potency, as measured by quantitative 1H NMR and microbiological assays, respectively. Two lots of the JP reference standard (RS) were used as test samples, with the contents of each component and impurity (sisomicin and garamine) being determined using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS).
Results:
The ratios of theoretical potency for C1, C2, and C1a were 1.00, 1.21, and 1.80, respectively. The potencies of the GmS JP RSs, which were estimated based on the contents and theoretical potency of each C component, corresponded well with those determined through microbiological assays. Marked differences in impurities (%) between the two RS lots were highlighted by quantifying sisomicin and garamine.
Conclusions:
The developed analytical procedure enabled the characterization of two different JP RSs in terms of content ratio, potencies, and impurities.
Highlights:
Novel analytical procedures useful for routine quality control of GmS were developed using HILIC-MS/MS.
