Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

07:06
Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice
Published on: January 24, 2025
535
Interspecific killing of wolverines by one wolf pack
Kiana B Young1, David T Saalfeld1, Colette Brandt2
1Division of Wildlife Conservation Alaska Department of Fish and Game Anchorage Alaska USA.
Ecology and Evolution
|December 11, 2023
Summary
Gray wolves (Canis lupus) were observed killing wolverines (Gulo gulo) in North America. These predatory events were not for consumption, suggesting territoriality or competition as likely causes.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Wildlife Biology
- North American Mammalogy
Background:
- Predator-prey interactions are crucial in ecosystem dynamics but often understudied, especially between large carnivores.
- Gray wolves (Canis lupus) and wolverines (Gulo gulo) share habitats and food resources in North America, leading to potential interspecific competition.
- Limited documentation exists on interactions between wolves and wolverines due to their elusive nature and low population densities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To document and analyze instances of gray wolves killing wolverines.
- To investigate the potential ecological drivers behind these interspecific predatory events.
- To enhance understanding of wolf and wolverine ecology and their interactions.
Main Methods:
- Observational study documenting three separate incidents of wolf pack predation on wolverines over 13 months.
- Analysis of kill sites and circumstances to infer motivations behind the predation.
- Review of existing literature on wolf and wolverine behavior and ecology.
Main Results:
- Three documented cases of a wolf pack killing a wolverine within a 13-month period.
- None of the killed wolverines were consumed by the wolves, indicating food was not the primary motive.
- Observed predation events suggest potential resource defense, territoriality, or interspecific competitive killing.
Conclusions:
- Wolf predation on wolverines, while rare, provides critical insights into interspecific competition and predator behavior.
- These interactions highlight the complex ecological relationships between apex predators in North American ecosystems.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications of these interactions on wolf and wolverine populations and community structure.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
13.1K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
13.1K
Competition
21.7K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.7K
Threats to Biodiversity
22.3K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
22.3K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.3K
Symbiosis
28.2K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
28.2K
Keystone Species
21.6K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
21.6K

